Sure. Good afternoon, Stephen. Thanks so much for your question. No. That's a great question. While we don't have, I would say, a target per se, in the past, we had sort of mentioned 3.0 debt-to-equity as sort of the right balance between leverage and earnings. And I think we have been successful in staying within plus or minus that 3.0 debt-to-equity ratio. I would say right now, we're underneath that 3.0, if you want to call it, approximately 2.5 to 2.75 is sort of the target range overall. But having said that, I think it's important to point out that, again, it will depend on the multitude of factors, I think you suggested one of them, which is really important, which is our recourse leverage those that are subject to potential margin calls, even if they are simply credit-based and not spread-based, what is termed out? What is less termed out? What is the rate of that financing? What is the maturity of that financing? So there is a multitude of factors that we're taking to account. But I would say generically, just given current market conditions, we would like to seek to reduce our leverage further from that 2.9 total leverage ratio that we have today, the 1.9 recourse leverage ratio today, tweak it down a little further, but again, it will be an evolving situation based upon the totality of what our liabilities and, of course, asset performance looks like. And, of course, it's a fact that we are 95% senior that I think when you compare our leverage ratio to maybe some of our peers who may not be as focused on senior. And that leverage ratio really needs to take into account some maybe the off-balance sheet leverage that others may have on their loans. So, again, I just want to emphasize that. We are 95% senior and therefore, the leverage ratio should really be taking into consideration with that into account.