Thanks, Bryan. The second quarter reflects meaningful progress in the direction we have been working toward. Revenue grew strongly and business returned to positive adjusted EBITDA and Midwest began contributing immediately. Those results are encouraging, but they also underscore the next phase of our work, ensuring that growth translates more consistently into gross margin, cash generation and returns. I'll provide additional context on where that conversion stands today, the actions underway to improve it and how those priorities are guiding our capital allocation. Starting with the top line. Second quarter net sales were $25.7 million an increase of $7 million or 37.6% compared with the prior year period. Pounds shipped increased 15.2% and average selling price increased approximately 23% while Midwest contributed $1.9 million of sales following the May 4 acquisition. Excluding Midwest, our legacy business still grew approximately 28% year-over-year, but a strong growth in the specialty chemicals market that remains soft. Before turning to gross margin, I'll briefly cover the remainder of the income statement. SG&A was $5.5 million in the quarter, down approximately $900,000 from the prior year and improving to 21.5% of sales from 34.5%. The year-over-year reduction included lower incentive compensation and professional fees partially offset by investments in salaries, wages and benefits and the addition of Midwest. Over the longer term, our objective is to bring SG&A toward approximately 15% of revenue on a run rate basis. We have increasing confidence in the target as we continue to optimize our corporate functions, install repeatable processes and standardize how we operate across the portfolio. Reaching that level require both continued cost discipline and growth across the platform, but we believe the operating model we are putting in place can support meaningful additional leverage as the business scales. Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations was $1.5 million or 5.7% of sales compared with a loss of approximately $300,000 in the prior year quarter. The improvement reflects higher gross profit and materially lower corporate cost. While this is an important step forward, the earnings contribution from the growth we have won remains below our expectations, which brings me to profitability. Gross profit increased 14% to $5.5 million from $4.9 million in the prior year quarter. Gross margin, however, declined 21.6% from 26.1%. On a year-to-date basis, gross profit increased 5% to $8.4 million, while gross margin declined 320 basis points to 18.5% from 21.7%. The year-to-date margin decline reflected pressure in both material cost and conversion costs. Material costs increased by approximately 127 basis points as a percentage of sales, driven in-part by inflation in petroleum-based raw materials and freight, while other cost of goods sold increased by approximately 193 basis points. We have taken pricing and sourcing actions to offset those pressures but there's typically a timing gap between those actions -- typically, a timing gap before those actions are fully reflected in reporting -- reported results. The conversion cost pressure also reflects where Ascent is in its development. As we scale newer expanding programs can require incremental inventory, production planning, labor, customer support and network coordination before they reach steady-state efficiency. At our current scale, changes in mix, production timing and asset utilization can therefore have a more visible impact on quarterly margins than they would in a larger, more mature platform. The result is that the revenue growth we have generated is not yet carrying through the gross profit at the level we expect. That is the opportunity in front of us, improving sourcing, pricing realization, throughput, campaign planning and network utilization of the growth already in the business converts more consistently into margin and cash flow. Midwest is a positive early example of that model in practice. The business entered the portfolio with a gross margin of approximately 26% and was accretive to the quarter, while also adding a greater mix of product revenue, technical capability and customer access. Its contribution reinforces the type of higher quality earnings profile we are working to build across the broader platform. The near-term focus is therefore execution, allowing recently won business to mature, tightening production and labor planning and improving absorption as utilization builds. We expect those actions, together with the pricing and sourcing initiatives already underway, to reduce the temporary inefficiencies associated with growth and improve the consistency of margin performance over time. We do working capital in the same way, extending appropriate terms, carrying the right raw materials and positioning inventory to support a customer launch can be productive uses of capital when they help us win and retain attractive business. The growth alone is not sufficient. Those investments must be accompanied by disciplined pricing, reliable collection, optimize inventory, efficient production and margins that support an acceptable return on the capital deployed. We are, therefore, managing margin and working capital as one operating objective, not a separate finance exercises. We will continue to support growth, but we will be increasingly selective about where we deploy working capital and will not accept structurally weak margins simply to add revenue. The optimization work Bryan described is intended to improve annual gross profit by approximately $3 million to $5 million through sourcing, manufacturing improvements and better use of the network. We are seeing tangible progress, including improved capacity on reaction assets, lower corporate costs and the early integration benefits from Midwest. At the same time, the current margin profile makes clear that the work is not complete. Our near-term financial priority is to translate the revenue base we have built into higher gross margin and more consistent cash generation. As we look to the balance of the year, investors should expect a moderate contraction in gross margin in the fourth quarter from the stronger second and third quarter periods. That is consistent with the seasonal pattern we experienced in 2025 and with the normal program timing and turnover in portions of our custom manufacturing portfolio. We are not viewing that expected movement as a change in trajectory. Ascent is not yet a fully scaled platform, and quarterly results can move meaningfully based on mix, production timing and customer schedules. For that reason, we believe the trailing 12-month view provides the clearest measure of whether this business is progressing through the quarterly noise. On that basis, the direction of the business continues to point upward. Turning to cash. We ended June with $28.1 million of cash and cash equivalents and no borrowings under our revolving credit facility. We have an additional $17.9 million of revolver availability, resulting in approximately $46 million of total liquidity. Cash declined by approximately $29.5 million from year end. The principal uses were clear and deliberate, approximately $14.6 million for the Midwest acquisition, $6.9 million for share repurchases and $1.2 million for capital expenditures. Operating activities used $7.7 million of cash during the first half, driven primarily by working capital. Accounts receivable used approximately $6.5 million of cash, reflecting higher receivables as sales grew. The $800,000 escrow related to the sale of American Stainless Tubing has already been received and is additive to the quarter end cash balance I referenced, while the remaining $4.5 million associated with the Bristol Metals transaction is expected to be released in October 2026. Beyond receivables and the timing of those escrow proceeds inventory used approximately $1.1 million, while accounts payable provided approximately $2.6 million of cash. Overall, operating working capital absorbed approximately $7.6 million in the first half. Separately, the timing of the escrow proceeds reduced reported cash at quarter end, but those amounts represent contractually deferred divestiture proceeds rather than underlying operating cash consumption. Our cash conversion cycle increased to 75 days, up 12 days from the prior year. Days sales outstanding increased to 66 days. Days inventory outstanding increased to 47 days and days payable outstanding declined to 37 days. Some of that reflects the timing and support required to the growth we have won, but the current level is higher than we want and is not a permanent requirement of the business. We are targeting an initial 5-day improvement in the cash conversion cycle with the greatest opportunities in inventory discipline and vendor terms, while continuing to improve collections without undermining strategically important customer relationships. At our current scale, we estimate that each 5-day improvement could release approximately $1 million to $1.5 million cash, depending on the mix of working capital improvements. Our objective is to bring the cycle towards 70 days and then to continue to improve as the new revenue base matures. The opportunity is also an important context for how investors should view our first half cash use, relative to the run rate we anticipate going forward. Excluding the acquisition and share repurchases, the business used approximately $9 million of free cash flow in the first half, of which approximately $7.6 million is working capital. Before working capital changes, the business was near cash breakeven. As we restore margin, normalized working capital and sequence capital deployment against our priorities, we expect the cash use run rate to decline materially from the first half. Looking ahead, before considering any additional discretionary capital deployment, we expect cash to recover into the mid-$30 million range as operating cash use moderates and the 2 escrow amounts are received. With borrowing capacity expected to remain in the high-teens that would result in an anticipated total liquidity in the low to mid-$50 million range. We would then evaluate acquisitions and share repurchases within the capital allocation framework and in light of liquidity, working capital needs and expected returns. That leads directly to our capital allocation framework. We are managing capital across five priorities in order: liquidity, working capital, internal investment, strategic M&A and share repurchases. The order matters. First, we will protect liquidity and maintain sufficient flexibility to operate through normal volatility. Second, we will fund working capital where it supports attractive durable growth while holding the organization accountable for cash conversion and margin. Third, we will invest internally in safety, maintenance, technology and high-return projects to improve productivity, capacity and gross profit. Fourth, we will preserve strategic optionality for acquisitions that improve the quality of the portfolio. Midwest is a good example. It added higher-margin product revenue, technical application capabilities and customer access and it was immediately accretive to adjusted EBITDA. We remain disciplined and prioritize existing earnings quality over speculative synergy assumptions. Fifth, we will repurchase shares opportunistically, when the expected return is compelling relative to other uses of capital and when liquidity, working capital and operating investments are appropriately funded. During the second quarter, we repurchased approximately 210,000 shares or $2.9 million at an average price of $13.80 per share. For the first half, we repurchased approximately 506,000 shares for $6.9 million, and we had approximately 1.5 million shares remaining under the authorization at quarter end. In the near term, the highest return use of capital is improving cash conversion and restoring gross margin. That does not mean stepping back from growth. It simply means making the growth we have already won, more efficient, more profitable and less cash intensive while deploying capital in order we have outlined. We believe that discipline will produce a substantially lower cash use run rate and allow the upward trajectory of the business to become more visible over time. With that, I'll turn it back to the operator for questions.