Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Q2 2013 ACCO Brands Corp. Earnings Conference Call. My name is Marie, and I will be your operator for today. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. And now, I'd like to hand the call over to Jennifer Rice, President of Investor Relations. Please proceed.

Good morning, everyone, and welcome to our second quarter 2013 conference call. Speaking on the call today are Boris Elisman, President and Chief Executive Officer of ACCO Brands Corporation; and Neal Fenwick, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Slides that accompany this call have been posted to the Investor Relations section of accobrands.com. These slides provide detailed information to supplement this call. When speaking to the quarterly results, we refer to adjusted pro forma results, including Mead, for the entire prior year period. Adjusted results exclude restructuring and merger-related costs, and apply a normalized effective tax rate of 35% in the current quarter and 30% in the prior year. Schedules of adjusted results and a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures begin on Page 8 of our press release. During the call, we may make forward-looking statements, and based on certain risk factors and uncertainties, our actual results could differ materially. Please refer to our press release and SEC filings for an explanation of certain of these factors. Our forward-looking statements are made as of today's date and we assume no obligation to update our forward-looking statements. Following our prepared remarks, we will hold a Q&A session. Now it is my pleasure to turn the call over to Boris Elisman.

Thank you, Jennifer, and good morning, everyone. Today, we announced our second quarter results. I'm pleased to report that despite the challenging marketplace, our school and office products businesses delivered solid results. Sales momentum improved in our North America and international segments, and cost savings and integration synergies contributed to expanded margins. Free cash flow remained strong, and we fully expect to deliver $150 million of cash for the year. Good working capital management has allowed us to minimize the seasonal short-term borrowing that we have traditionally done during this period in prior years. On a pro forma basis, including the results of Mead Consumer and Office Products business in both periods, sales decreased slightly less than 6% in the second quarter, driven primarily by lower volume. Adjusted income from continuing operations grew 4% to $22 million or $0.19 per share compared to $21 million or $0.18 per share in the prior-year quarter, despite a 500-basis-points increase in our normalized tax rate. Our sales decline significantly moderated in our North America and international segments, as we started to further lap some of the declines of last year, particularly in Europe. Our cost savings initiatives and merger cost synergies are on track and materializing according to plan. As a result, we saw strong margin improvement in both segments, with North America operating income increasing 18% and margin expanding 280 basis points, and international operating income increasing 29% and margin expanding 210 basis points. Despite the tough demand environment, I'm pleased with improving sales momentum in school and office in both North America and international segments, especially in the U.S., Europe and Mexico, and we've seen continued strong sales execution in Brazil. We're making progress with sales synergies and have begun shipping Mead-branded products into Mexico and Europe, the Middle East and…

Thank you, Boris. Good morning, everyone. Our second quarter performance is recapped on our slide deck. Reported sales increased slightly to $440 million. On a pro forma basis, including the results of Mead C&OP for the full 3 months in both periods, sales decreased slightly less than 6%, driven primarily by volume, which declined 5%. The volume decline was mainly in North America, which was the result of soft demand and our proactive exit of $7 million of low margin sales. We also saw continued declines in Computer Products. Adjusted income from continuing operations was $21.8 million or $0.19 per share compared to $21 million or $0.18 per share in the prior year quarter. The improvement was driven by cost savings, synergies and lower interest expense, which more than offset the increased tax rate. In terms of margins, we made great progress on both our cost synergies and productivity initiatives. Gross margins, as detailed on Slide 4, increased 110 basis points to 31.1%, driven by cost savings and synergies, which added 220 basis points in the quarter. This more than offset adverse mix and sales deleveraging, which had a 100-basis-point impact on gross margin. SG&A expenses were down in the quarter, but as a percentage of sales, increased 60 basis points to 19.4% due to the continued impact of sales deleveraging. Cost savings and synergies were a 150-basis-point benefit to SG&A margin, but sales deleveraging and incentives impacted by 260 basis points. In all, operating income margin improved 70 basis points to 10.4%, driven by executing against our cost savings and synergy objectives, which more than offset the impact of the top line decline. Turning to an overview of our pro forma segments. In North America, pro forma sales decreased nearly 6% due to lower volume. Half of the volume…

[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Brad Thomas from KeyBanc Capital Markets.

I wanted to start off first with a discussion of the -- just the outlook for top line in the second half of the year. Obviously, a challenging quarter here in Computer Products in the second quarter, but as it relates to your new guidance, could you just take us through the thinking in terms of the top line in the different segments in the back half of the year?

Sure. If you look at our North America segment, our assumption is that we're going to be slightly down versus prior year in the second half. If you look at our international segment, the assumption is we're going to be slightly up with Brazil -- a growth in Brazil really offsetting flattish performance, or maybe even slightly down in Australia, but flattish everywhere else. And the assumption for Computer Products is that we're going to be slightly up in the remainder of the year versus prior year. If you remember, last year at this time, especially in Q3, we saw weak Computer Products sales. So from a compare perspective, we think we're going to be slightly up versus prior year.

So on the Computer Products, it's the comparisons coupled with some new product launches that should help you?

Exactly. We're expecting new tablet and smartphone launches late in the third quarter or in the fourth quarter, and we expect that to drive a substantial improvement in sales in our Computer Products. But it's very volatile and clearly, if some of those anchor devices launches move, then it will also affect our sales.

Right. And then I wanted to ask a second question around the expense and productivity opportunity ahead of the company. This year looks like a very big, successful year in terms of pulling costs out of the business, between the synergies with Mead, as well as productivity improvements in general. That's really, I think, in the DNA of ACCO. Boris, maybe you could -- and Neal, if you want to chime in, maybe you guys could talk a little about how you're thinking about the opportunity in 2014 and beyond to continue to improve the cost structure of the business?

As we mentioned, this is something that we've been doing for a few years now, and something that we will continue to do, as the best companies do, from a -- just a cost-reduction Lean Six Sigma productivity improvement perspective. Certainly, most of the synergies that have been derived from the merger will be -- will benefit us in 2013. Some of that will bleed over into 2014. Just from a timing perspective, some things that we've done in the middle of second half of this year will obviously benefit us in 2014. So we'll see a little bit of benefit from that, but outside of that, we still expect to drive significant productivity improvements in 2014 and 2015 and beyond. This is something that we expect from our organization on an ongoing basis. We have a -- people who are dedicated to that. We have a system and processes who are monitoring that and making sure that all of the projects get implemented and appropriately measured. So we feel very good about our ability to achieve that. And as you saw in our Q2 release, we've -- before, we talked about $20 million to $25 million of productivity improvements, now we feel that we definitely got the $25 million identified. So we're narrowing to $25 million for this year. So we're certainly making progress in that area.

And our next question comes from the line of Arnie Ursaner from CJS Securities.

Your basic business model is leveraged to volume improvement. So maybe again, you could expand a little more of how you're achieving even greater productivity, given the volume trends are going the wrong way.

We have a fairly large, diverse business. We have lots of suppliers, we have several different manufacturing facilities. We have roughly 5,800 people in the organization. So with all of that, there's lots of opportunity for us to streamline, to consolidate, to leverage processes, to centralize and to drive cost out of the business. Best companies have a goal of 2% to 3% of COGS in annual productivity improvements. We are on the way there, we're not there yet, and we're making improvements every year. We're striving towards the goal. And as I mentioned, we have solid plans with hundreds of projects identified that allow us to achieve substantial savings.

Okay. Neal, 2 specific questions for you. One, was there any reversal in the quarter in the SG&A line for previously-accrued cliff bonus payments?

No, actually incentive payments were an increase of about $2.7 million in the quarter.

Okay. And your stock-based comp jumped almost $3 million from Q1 to Q2?

That was that the $2.7 million I was referencing. It was stock-based comp, so it was the main jump. In terms of annual incentive, it was flat year-over-year.

And Arnie, it's because we're doing better in generating cash versus our goals than prior year. So that's what's driving the incremental stock comp.

Okay. Final question for me, if I can. The back-to-school season, you do have some key customers that are going through a consolidation process. In your opinion or view, do you think they have already begun to reduce inventories in anticipation of the merger?

It's hard to tell, so I'm giving you an opinion only. But in my opinion, they are being careful in how much inventory they stock for back-to-school.

And our next question comes from the line of Chris McGinnis from Sidoti & Co. Christopher McGinnis - Sidoti & Company, LLC: Just a couple of questions. One, you talked about loss of share in North America in your remarks. Can you just maybe expand on that, of maybe who you're losing share to?

Sure. So I think we've -- we're talking about losing share in certain small parts of our business. I think we lost a little bit of share in our Dated business, so this is calendars, organizers, time management. We still have a very, very strong market position. But I do think we lost a little bit of share, especially in more fashion-oriented parts of that business and lower price points. I also think we lost a little bit of share, and this is not just in this quarter but over time, in our notebook business. We have a very, very solid position in premium notebooks, but a lot of that market is going down to lower price points, where we don't have the assortment that we need to have. So this is one of the things we're trying to fix, both for Dated and for notebooks. We have done that over the last year in Brazil, and were very successful in growing significantly faster than the market in gaining substantial share on the shelves. And this is a strategy we're pursuing in the U.S. as well. And also, as Neal mentioned, we -- in our binder business, we walked away from some business and it is a share loss, because our share is low as a result, but we've greatly improved profitability by doing that. Christopher McGinnis - Sidoti & Company, LLC: Sure. And just that -- I think you referenced the 3-tier program or 3-tier offering, that you're bringing that into the U.S. now? Is that kind of what you're speaking to?

Yes. The open price points mid-tier and the premium price points. Yes, we are working both with our factories, as well as with our customers, to expand our assortment and bring lower-priced products in Dated goods and in notebook categories to the U.S. Correct, we're working on that right now. Christopher McGinnis - Sidoti & Company, LLC: Okay. And then just -- can you maybe just speak about the margin profile on the Computer segment going forward? And obviously, it's down pretty substantial, but with the volume coming back, how does that impact the margin in that segment as well?

Yes. If you compare the margin this year, so far, it's roughly 10%, slightly a little bit south of 10% versus 20% last year. 20% was not a sustainable operating margin for the Computer Products and we knew that, everybody else knew that. Our goal, our long-term goal, is to be in the mid-teens for Computer Products. We talked about in the 17% range or something like that. We still think that that's an achievable goal. Obviously, it's just going to be -- will have to be achieved at a higher volume, because some of the costs in that business are fixed. Now that we're going to back-to-school season and the holiday season, which traditionally have been stronger for Computer Products, we do expect that to improve our margin profile in that business. And longer term, we still have the expectations that it will be a mid-teens business for us.

And our next question comes from the line of Bill Chappell from SunTrust.

I just wanted to -- I guess just first, on the currency. Can you kind of give us an impact what that did on both top and bottom line for the quarter? And I assume it's all on the international division?

Actually, North America includes Canada, so there's a tiny piece that impacts that and obviously, Computer Products is also -- perhaps half the business is outside the U.S. So FX affects all 3 segments. From a top line perspective, we saw a big reduction in the impact on the business. If you remember, Q1 was negative by about 1.5%, Q2 top line was only negative by 0.4%. From a bottom line perspective, again Q1 was adverse, Q2 was slightly favorable, and the net position at the end of Q2 is basically no bottom line impact on the business. And as we all know, it's a question going forward of where currencies are going and if I could predict them better, I would be doing a different job. But there are a lot of -- there's a lot of volatility in the forecast for currency and it's anywhere from no impact at all on the business to a small impact, which is why we excluded it from our guidance.

So based on current spot rates, would you expect to get a minimal impact for the second half of the year?

If current spot rates continued and they've been improving of late, so we don't think that they're going to, the worst we would see would be about $0.02 impact on the bottom line.

Okay. And Boris, help us on the Computer Products business. Kind of what gives you confidence that it can turn, stabilize? And when I say that, I mean, are you already shipping, now as we're getting into August, products for some of these new launches in the fall? Or is that just you've got it built, you're sitting on the sidelines and hoping things show up?

There are several parts to your question. So we have been in this business for a long time and we have seen the ups and downs of the business. That's just the nature of technology. And we're a little bit on the receiving end of this business because we're an accessories business, so we have to accessorize hosts or anchor devices, and so we depend on how hot they are and when they're going to be introduced and how much demand there is for them. So what we're seeing in this quarter or last quarter is not unprecedented. We've seen these things before. We are expecting fairly significant launches in the end of Q3, early Q4, from the device makers. We are preparing for those launches. We have many tens of products ready for those launches. We are in the presale process right now, and we're getting positive feedback from customers. But we can't really ship until those products are launched, the devices are launched. So that's why we're being a little bit cautious, because there is still some volatility associated with when the devices will be introduced and when we can ship our products. And maybe it will be in Q3, but maybe all of it will be in Q4. So there's some uncertainty around that.

But you see enough to get comfortable that the business can grow in the second half?

We are expecting a slight growth. As I mentioned, roughly mid-single-digit growth in the second half. And I feel pretty good about that, yes.

And then switching back to the core business in Brazil. Are you seeing any slowdown, weaknesses, just with some of the macro trends hitting that region?

We haven't seen the slowdown in our business. It's still very, very strong. Obviously, we're fully aware of what's going on in Brazil and some of the demonstrations, but we haven't seen it impacting our business. We are monitoring very, very closely, but no signs of it impacting our business. In Brazil, Q2 is their smallest quarter. So now is the time when a real season starts in Brazil, so we'll be monitoring very closely. I'm going down there next month just to personally see how we're doing for back-to-school. That team has been executing great for us, and we have very, very high hopes for the second half.

Great, and last one for me. Just in the core U.S., I mean, are you seeing any, and you might have mentioned this, the difference in kind of sales from the consumables versus durables? And does that tell you anything in kind of the outlook for the back half?

Nothing specific. What we have seen is there's definitely been a slowdown in government purchases and a lot of our durable machines, especially in the Print Finishing Solutions business. So this is wide-format laminators, big shredders go to government, and that's been slow. But other than that, Neal? Have we -- in consumables versus durables?

No, they haven't. There hasn't been any additional [indiscernible] on that. No, in both cases, it's been much more of a question. This year has been heavily impacted. As we discussed in Q1, there was a lot of inventory channel change which impacted our business a lot in Q1. It didn't impact it in Q2. And it's -- a lot of that was around the durables side, as you would imagine. From a general business point of view, they're both looking weak at the moment, and we look for an improvement as we get into the second half.

And our next question comes from the line of Helen Pan from Barclays.

A couple of questions. Were there specific regions or customers or segments that you expected to recover in the second quarter that didn't? For example, maybe in Australia, Asia, the government, some businesses? And can you kind of explain what happened there?

It's really not customer-specific. The biggest change to our second quarter versus expectation was in the Computer Products business. If I look at all of our other businesses in North America or international, it's close to expectations, give or take. I think the sales were a little bit softer, just a little bit, but we were able to drive our cost reductions to offset the lost gross profit from the sales. So from an international and the U.S., North America perspective, things are pretty much to expectations. The Computer Products were definitely weaker than we expected, and that was pretty much across the board. The PC market was weaker than expected and that drove lower sales of PC accessories. The tablet market was weaker than was expected and that drove lower sales of tablet and smartphone accessories.

So then in the Computer Products group, what are you kind of doing, beyond preparing for the launches in the second half, to kind of strengthen that segment? Are you getting any traction with selling, perhaps, security products related to maybe tablets and smartphones?

Security products are actually doing okay. They're doing to plan. We have a high-market-share position there. We don't believe we've lost any share whatsoever, even though we've been off-patent for 6 quarters now. Obviously, we lost the royalty that went along with it in prior years, and that drove some of the margin decline in the quarter. But we've maintained our presence in security. We're doing category management with some of our OEMs for that, which has continued to drive good sales for us going forward. The PC accessories market, outside of securities, we're also -- given just the overall market weakness, we're pretty close to expectations. I think the biggest issue was in the tablet space. And we're a little bit in between launches here. So what we're doing is we're preparing for the launch, we're selling our existing products, we're expanding internationally, we're fairly strong in the U.S., in Europe, but fairly weak outside of those 2 major areas. So we are going after sales in Brazil. We've launched 100 SKUs in Brazil. We're going to have -- every quarter, they did better in Q2 than in Q1, and we have incremental plans to expand distribution in Brazil in the second half. We are -- we've reorganized how we go to market in Canada to try to take advantage of our Canadian organization in driving Computer Products sales. We've changed our go-to-market model in Japan as well, to try to provide more focus on Computer Products. So we're changing how we're attacking the business from a sales and marketing perspective. But from a product perspective, we really do need these new devices to launch to add some excitement to the category and to create demand for accessories.

And our next question comes with the line of Karru Martinson from Deutsche Bank.

When we look back at the MeadWestvaco acquisition, I think we were talking about a 320 EBITDA number post-synergies and then top line around $2.1 billion. I mean, given the slowdown in the Computers in terms of the shifts there, I mean, do we still feel that we can get to those numbers with the cost saves?

The 320? We certainly, absolutely believe we can get to. The $2.1 billion is going to be difficult, just given the weak demand conditions. So the economic headwinds will need to change for the $2.1 billion in sales. But the cost savings are ahead of plan and it should help mitigate the margin decrease that comes from lower sales.

Okay. And when do you feel that -- I realize that cost savings are a continuous part of your culture, and that's something that's going to be flowing through for some time to come. But when do you feel that the bulk of those synergies and cost savings will be reflected in your numbers?

On the synergies, the bulk is in 2013. So the $20 million is 100% of our commitment. We'll probably over-deliver to that because there will be some bleed over into next year, but that's not going to be nearly what we've delivered this year. So the bulk will definitely be in 2013. From a productivity improvement perspective, I expect us to build on that every year. So my expectation is that we will be able to improve on that number every year.

Okay. And when we look at the back-to-school season, there has been some headlines here just being -- expectations being a little bit softer. How do you feel that will play into kind of your sell-in and -- that you've had and the inventory that's actually on the shelves at retail?

It's too early to call back-to-school right now. We're now second week. We are pleased with the sell-in. Our sell-in in the second quarter, both in the U.S. and Canada were comparable to what we did last year. We do think we have a better assortment on the shelf, and we think we have a better demand generation plan than last year. So we have high expectations going into the season, but we will be able to only tell you at the end of Q3 how we did.

And just lastly, given the strong free cash flow here. I mean, you guys made some voluntary prepayments in the first quarter of last year -- of this year. Is that kind of how we should think of the uses of free cash flow going forward?

One of the things that we've said continuously is that we do generate a lot of cash, and one of the things that we believe is it would be appropriate for us to reduce our leverage. And so, we're actively focused on reducing our leverage. It's the primary use of our cash flow. And again, we are very seasonal in terms of how we generate that cash. So the majority of our cash that we can use to pay debt down comes in at the end of Q3 and more so in Q4. And so that will be our focus.

And now, I'd like to turn the call over to Boris Elisman, President and CEO, for closing remarks.

Thank you, operator, and thank you, everyone, for joining us this morning. To summarize, we are pleased with Q2 progress in North America and international businesses, and are on track to generate $150 million of cash for the year. We have now entered our strongest selling season, and I look forward to speaking with you on our back-to-school results at the end of Q3. Thank you. Have a great morning.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. That concludes your conference call for today. Thank you for joining us, and you may now all disconnect.