Sure. I’d be happy to. So, the Netherlands, as many of these markets are, you have to make some early bets on what is the regulatory framework going to be. I think one of the most important developments that we’ve seen is consistently international markets are allowing to import EU GMP flower. Now, it’s very challenging in many times because you test in their labs, you have to have a lot of precision. But first and foremost, from a production standpoint, when you compare the production costs and the leverage and efficiencies we have in ramping up Canadian production versus production in that marketplace, it just didn’t make sense from a production standpoint. Secondarily, the evolution of what was going to be this pilot test in that market really has not transpired. And so, given the incredible strength that we’re seeing in other markets, not only ones we talk a lot about, say, Germany and Poland, but also Australia and the U.K., with limited resources, it made sense to focus there. In terms of France, it’s a very topical question. We’ve just recently learned a little bit more about their pilot. So, we’ve been in it from the beginning. There were nine tenders, so to speak, of different products. Three of them were flower. We had all of those. And recently, what they’ve announced, importantly, is an extension of that system for about five years and we expect that that’s going to dovetail into the medical cannabis regime. They have said no inhalables, as they define as both flower and vape. And so, the other formats will take the lead. We have pivoted off of flower. We’ll be doing extracts there. Now, listen, as with all regs, things evolve and that doesn’t mean forever no on inhalables. But that’s the current situation. But it’s a big market with a lot of adjacent population. It’s obviously very close to great markets, such as the U.K. and Germany. So, we’ll see how it evolves. But right now, that’s sort of the latest on it, John.