Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Arcosa Inc. First Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Shelby, and I will be your conference call coordinator today. As a reminder today's call is being recorded. Now, I would like to turn the call over to your host Erin Drabek, Director of Investor Relations for Arcosa. Ms. Drabek, you may begin.

Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining Arcosa's First Quarter 2023 Earnings Call. With me today are Antonio Carrillo, President and CEO; and Gail Peck, CFO. A question-and-answer session will follow their prepared remarks. A copy of yesterday's press release and the slide presentation for this morning's call are posted on our Investor Relations website ir.arcosa.com. A replay of today's call will be available for the next two weeks. Instructions for accessing the replay number are included in the press release. A replay of the webcast will be available for one year on our website under the News and Events tab. Today's comments and presentation slides contain financial measures that have not been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to the closest GAAP measure are included in the appendix of the slide presentation. In addition, today's conference call contains forward-looking statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements. Please refer to the company's SEC filings for more information on these risks and uncertainties, including the press release we filed yesterday and our Form 10-Q expected to be filed later today. I would like to now turn the call over to Antonio.

Thank you, Erin. Good morning, thank you for joining us to discuss our first quarter results, and our updated outlook for 2023. I will start with a few key messages. Arcosa delivered outstanding first quarter results driven by strong financial and operational performance from all three business segments. In what remains a challenging macroeconomic environment the entire Arcosa team executed exceptionally well operating efficiently and generating record adjusted EBITDA. Over the past several years, we have undertaken several strategic actions to simplify our portfolio and position our businesses to achieve sustainable long-term growth. Our first quarter results demonstrate the success of our strategy with both our growth and cyclical businesses generating strong results. Construction Products led the performance in the first quarter. Excluding the gain on a land sale adjusted, EBITDA increased to 32%. Robust pricing more than offset lower overall volumes and contributed to impressive unit profitability gains. We plan to remain focused on value over volume staying disciplined on price and effectively combating inflationary pressures. Our first quarter results also highlighted the potential of our cyclical business. In Transportation Products, we improved margins by 450 basis points as volumes increased and created significant operating leverage. Our backlog for our barge business at the end of the first quarter is at the highest level in three years and now provides production visibility into 2024. Likewise in wind towers, our backlog is expanding and this sets the stage for significant upside potential in 2024 and beyond due to the multiyear tailwinds provided by the Inflation Reduction Act. During the quarter, we signed a multiyear agreement to produce wind towers and announced an investment in the brownfield facility in New Mexico, which should start production in mid-2024. Looking ahead to the balance of the year, Arcosa remains well positioned for continued solid financial performance. Even as we increase our investment in organic initiatives the strength of our balance sheet enables us to pursue potential acquisitions that meet our financial criteria and are complementary to our existing operations. We recently closed on two bolt-on acquisitions that further expand our Construction Products portfolio, our recycled aggregates producer in Arizona and our shoring manufacturing in Houston. These acquisitions, while relatively small individually are significant in that they broaden our presence and capabilities in two major southern markets. With our market-leading positions and opportunities across our portfolio to capitalize on increased infrastructure spending I am very optimistic about our future. Gail will now provide detail on our financial results for the first quarter, and I will return to discuss our updated outlook. Gail?

Thank you, Antonio. I'll begin on slide 11 to discuss our first quarter segment results. In Construction Products, revenues increased 12%, primarily due to higher pricing in the quarter which more than offset overall organic volume decline. Recent acquisitions contributed approximately one-quarter of the revenue growth largely attributable to RAMCO which we acquired last May. Adjusted segment EBITDA increased 85% year-over-year or $35 million, due to the $22 million land sale gain in our natural aggregates business and healthy improvement in unit profitability. Excluding the land sale gain as well as freight and delivery from revenues, first quarter adjusted EBITDA margins increased 370 basis points to 26.5% for the segment. This is the first time, we have reported margins excluding freight which is a pass-through cost in our construction materials businesses and dilutes reported margins. Higher diesel, process fuels and cement prices increased segment cost of sales by approximately $5 million or 3%, during the quarter. This is down from the inflationary cost impact in the fourth quarter of 2022, as diesel prices have moved lower from the peak last year. Turning to natural aggregates. We continue to experience broad pricing strength across our markets with average organic pricing up more than 20% in the first quarter. Volumes were down low double digits, primarily due to weakness in single-family residential and wet weather that impacted volumes early in the quarter. This decline was partially offset by increased volume, for public and private non-residential activity given the successful transition of volume in certain markets. Due to our disciplined pricing strategy, we expanded unit profitability in the first quarter and achieved higher year-over-year margins excluding the land sale gain. In recycled aggregates, strength in Texas DOT work drove substantially higher, organic volumes in our Houston and Dallas operations. However, unusually wet weather…

Thank you Gail. As we indicated in our fourth quarter call, we expect 2023 will be a transition year from a financial standpoint. We anticipate our growth businesses will benefit from generally solid market fundamentals, while our cyclical businesses undergo significant manufacturing ramp-up and experience gradual improvement before achieving stronger profitability in 2024. Please turn to slide 16. We're raising slightly our 2023 revenue guidance to $2.25 billion at the midpoint, which represents an increase of 10% compared to 2022 normalizing for the sale of the storage tank business. Based on the outperformance in the first quarter and our expectations for improved profitability in our cyclical businesses due to the anticipated tax credits from wind towers, we're increasing our 2023 adjusted EBITDA guidance to $358 million at the midpoint, up from the prior midpoint of $325 million. This revised guidance includes estimated net wind power credits of approximately $20 million at the midpoint, which were not included in our previous range. Further clarification from the IRS on this tax credit is still pending. Please turn to slide 17 to review the outlook for our growth businesses. We believe Construction Products remains well-positioned to capitalize on continued significant better and safe investment in highway and other infrastructure projects. Infrastructure lending activities accelerating across many of our markets while pricing momentum remains favorable for both natural and recycled aggregates. Although, the housing market continues to show weakness across our markets, we are optimistic that improved pricing and demand for infrastructure projects should compensate the volume declines in housing. As we look further ahead, we believe that with stronger pricing, a recovery in housing, infrastructure spending and inflation receding, our Construction segment should be in great shape to continue to grow and improve margins over time. Turning to Engineered Structures. The overall outlook…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And we'll take our first question from Julio Romero with Sidoti & Company.

Hey, good morning, Antonio and Gail. I was hoping, you could talk about the progress on the rollout of the redesign barge product, did you just coil steel and how that's performing so far?

Sure Julio. Thank you for the question. As I mentioned in the previous call it's -- last year 2022, the prices between coil and plate started to diverge significantly. Historically, there's $150 a ton difference between a ton of plate and a ton of coil. Last year that number was almost at $1000. And that's when we started looking at the opportunity to redesign dry cargo barges with coil. We worked on it in the second half. And in the summer we launched our first coil barge and that generated significant demand for the barges mostly the orders in the fourth quarter came from coil. Throughout this quarter, we continue to offer our customers. Now the beauty of this is that we can offer coil barges or plate barges and we'll shift our production and our sales depending on that difference in prices. This year steel price start coming -- the last few years steel prices have been going up in the second half. Coil prices went down and this year started coming up. So that gap has strong some, but we have the ability now to move between the two. Probably the biggest message for you is this gives us flexibility in manufacturing flexibility for sale, but also of leverage between suppliers of steel, because we can now shift suppliers based on the difference in that price. So things are going well. The barge is fully designed and we are building barges today with coil.

Okay. Really helpful there. And I guess just thinking about the order trends in the barge business you had two straight quarters of $100 million plus in orders. But you also talked about the steel is still suppressing orders to an extent. So just talk about how you're managing the current trend line in steel over the last few months and how we should think about the variability in the barge business if steel continues on that trend line?

Yes. I think the most important message here is that the inquiries are tremendously strong. So we have a very strong -- we feel the market needing these barges. And I think what you're seeing with these orders, these orders even though coil has been cheaper than plate that we sold a few barges with coil and some models with plate. The price point of this barge is much higher than it was prior to the steel price ramp up. So I think our customers as I mentioned it in the script, some of our customers are moving their price points to the barges, because they really need barges or what we perceive in the market. So I think we'll -- I don't know about this quarter and the next it might not be a straight line. But I'm confident we will continue to get barge orders based on the inquiry levels we see. What I also mentioned is we're going to be as we sell more barges, of course, capacity gets tighter we're going to be focusing like in every other business in our margins. So we're not going to give our capacity away and I think we have we're in a great position to manage our capacity and our orders because now we have quite a long visibility until the early part of 2024.

Great. Appreciate you taking my question and I’ll pass it on.

And we'll take our next question from Garik Shmois with Loop Capital Markets.

Thanks and congrats on the quarter. Wondering if you could speak a little bit to the margin expansion in the Construction Product segment. Certainly, you're getting a new lease on pricing. Just wondering if you can maybe talk to the sustainability of this type of marketing expansion through the rest of the year?

Well, thank you for the question. It's -- I think this industry has always been characterized by this. You saw that you can move pricing even when volumes come down and I think that's been proven with what we're seeing in the market. I would tell you that we have many touch points to the market. But the area where we're seeing really strength is in the infrastructure side. When some of our businesses have more exposure to housing than others, aggregate is probably the one that has the most. But the ones that have -- but we still saw very significant improvement in pricing in aggregates. In recycled aggregates that has less exposure to housing, we saw pricing also very strong, but volumes are not as affected as natural aggregates. So our perception and what our goal for this year is to continue to offset volume declines with pricing increases and refocusing our capacity into infrastructure. And I think we'll be able to continue to do that. It's -- is it going to be a perfect line? Is it going to be choppy? Probably some areas in the country have more higher decline than others in volumes. And in those areas that's where we're pushing pricing higher. So -- it's -- I think it's a tight model. It's area by are mine-by-mine, but I'm more confident we can continue to push pricing and offset volume declines.

Okay, great. I wanted to just follow-up real quickly just on the weather impacts in the quarter. You cited some of the weakness being due to the rains in California. I was wondering, maybe is there a way to size the headwind that you saw due to weather, are you seeing any pent-up demand here in the second quarter as a result of some of those project push ups?

It's difficult for us to size it, but I'll tell you -- when you look at the numbers in recycled aggregates which is -- we had two impacts in California. One is recycled aggregates and some in specialty materials. The recycled aggregate is probably the easier one. It's projects -- the pent up demand is hard to measure because policy is delayed and it did about the same demand after the rain recede. But what I can see -- tell you is, of all our recycled aggregates in markets, the only one that last, let's say not in great shape was California. It was clearly tied to the rain that we have there. When the rain receded, we are in great shape and the volumes are coming up very steadily. So nothing wrong with the business. I think it was just a really outstanding rain event. But we are very optimistic about recycled aggregates in California.

Good morning, Garik, this is Gail. I guess, I would even just add, we did on the weather topic, we did -- we were sitting here a couple of months ago, January and February, we had certainly had some rain and colder weather here in the Dallas, Texas area. And I think, as we look at the quarter, very pleased to see what March came to bring when we had a very normal weather months for the quarter. And we were pleased to see that the volume pace that we had during the month of March. So, weather definitely had an impact. But as Antonio said, when the skies are clear, things seem to be according to plan from a volume perspective.

Okay. That’s great to hear. Thanks, again, and I’ll pass it on.

And we'll take our next question from Noah Merkousko with Stephens Inc.

Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions and congrats on the strong results.

Thank you.

I wanted to start on the wind towers business. You've seen increase in orders there. And I guess, just what's the typical lag in terms of getting an order and to be able to deliver on those? I think, you continue to see this year as a transition year for wind. So, I guess is that early '24 that you start to see? And then just given your capacity plans, how much of the backlog can you deliver on in that?

Let me start with the first part of the question. And just to reflect on where we are, six months ago this business was not looking pretty. I mean, we didn't have orders for 2024, for 2023, sorry for this year, we have no orders. So, we took some orders with very low margins to get the year started and keep our people working. And as the Inflation Reduction Act, let's say picks up pace and the projects we've developed, we're seeing very strong demand. And I think right now, what you will see is our ability to ramp up will depend on how fast we can hire people. It's really that simple, how fast we can hire and train our people. And we have orders, I think for 2023, we're basically set in what we can produce because we're ramping up. For 2024, we are not at capacity by any means. We have a plant that's idle. We have two plants that are not operating at full capacity and the plant in New Mexico that will start in the second -- around mid-2024 will not be at full capacity. So that is -- I think the message I would like to leave you with is, we're going to be dialing our labor and our capacity based on how we see the orders with the idea that the capacity we have available, we believe it's very valuable given the strength of the wind market and we're going to be focusing on selling it at a nice margin. We'll ramp up. I think, we're happy with where we are. But we are even happier with the capacity we have that we'll be able to sell and focus on increasing margins for '24 and beyond. This is a 10-year PTC. So that's giving significant visibility to the industry. So, I think -- we can think they do have a nice pace.

Got it. That's helpful. And then for my follow-up continuing to look at the Engineered Structures segment, some really nice margins during the quarter 14.5, somewhat higher than your typical 12% to 13% I think you typically look for there? I'm guessing tax credit played a role but can you help us understand sort of the margin drivers there and again how sustainable this is as we look forward?

I'll take that one. This is Gail. Yes we had – pleased with the margin performance, you're right. If you look at the segment year-over-year you had probably about 170 basis points of margin improvement in the segment. To your point part of that was the tax credit. We did recognize $3 million of the advanced manufacturing production tax credit. But even outside of that as I said in my script, we did see margins up against what was a pretty tough comp from last year. So consistent – we benefit from the long run. So we had some – your order PAM will vary from quarter-to-quarter. So we had some nice leverage from some longer production runs in the quarter. We expect to continue to have healthy margins throughout the year. I would note though from a cadence perspective and we talked about this a little bit on our last call as we see we have firm backlog which gives us very good visibility for the utility structures business and as we look at our backlog for Q2 notably, we talk about our clients and our big customers. As we look at the mix of customers for the second quarter, we expect to have a slightly higher component of bid, which will impact the margin for the second quarter. But full year outlook for the business continues to be very strong – strong demand drivers. We had nice volume increase in the quarter expect stronger volumes year-over-year. So outlook remains both favorable. I do want to point out though as we think about the cadence, we do anticipate a little bit of a step down in Q2 as we progress through the year.

If you think a little beyond than the quarter of this year I think we're very comfortable where we are for this year. But this segment has always been – is a combination of two businesses. You have Engineered Structures and related and wind. And since four or five years ago utility structure has been going up and the wind tower has been coming down. And as wind ramps up again, I think there's going to be a combination of margins that should lead to improvement in margins in this segment. As wind tower ramps up and we continue to gain momentum on utility. So I think the segment as a whole will start looking very, very nice as we ramp up wind towers.

Yes. I just might add on that too, it's important to highlight, particularly as we look at 2023 and then it helps with Antonio's view of 2023 and beyond or 2024 and beyond, we do still anticipate wind tower to be breakeven from an EBITDA perspective in 2023. Ex the tax credit. So the tax credits will certainly help. But we do see breakeven for wind. We did perform a little bit better in the first quarter. But as we've announced the New Mexico facility, we do anticipate additional start-up costs for that facility that will impact wind tower profitability this year.

Got it. That’s really helpful detail. Thanks. I’ll leave it there.

And we'll take our next question from Brent Thielman with D.A. Davidson.

Thanks. Hey, Antonio, I think a quarter ago you suggested that you thought the backlog and when it can grow, which was valid. I guess maybe I'll ask you the same question from the standpoint of expectations for wind orders to the rest of the year. I imagine that had another $800 million order often out there. But are these levels you anticipate building off of inquiry levels quite high because you've got a lot of available capacity out there elsewhere?

Yes, it's a good question. Yes we continue to see inquiry levels high. This business is very regional. So depending on where the projects are being developed you will see the demand. But what's interesting to me, the most interesting to be absolutely honest. We’ve been surprise at the speed of this industry, how fast it picked up. When the Inflation Reduction Act was approved in August of last year, I always said, it will take 12 to 18 months for us to start seeing the impact in our specific orders. And that's what I thought at the time. And it surprised us that it's the right factor, which leads me to believe that many of the projects that are really being developed based on the Inflation Reduction Act passing have really not come to market. So what we're seeing is a project that has been developed before and we're ready -- somewhat ready. So what's intresting about this is I think the Inflation Reduction Act, the impact we have really not seen. We've seen part of the certainty, but we have not seen the impact of new projects and that's extremely exciting for the future. Is it going to be this quarter? Probably not. But we will see that over time. I think we're building this business not for one year for several years. And the 10-year act I think it gives us a lot of optimism for the future.

Okay. Thanks for that. And I guess that my follow-up is we're all trying to kind of understand the implications of these tax credits to your P&L which is obviously based on the number of structures, you sell which I know you don't report. But can you help us understand giving us some guidance for this year, but can you help us understand I guess qualitatively your expectations for structures produced and sold this year relative to last year. This is what we're; trying to understand kind of the future impact as you get in the more robust production years?

Yeah, Brent. I'll try that one. As we've said before, given volume from a competitive perspective we haven't really elected to do. But I guess that conundrum with this tax credit that's based on volumes. I'd also point out, it's based on units sold and produced. It's also based on the megawatts of the installed turbine at the end of the day. So there's kind of two variables that impact it. We've given our best foot forward here with the estimate we have in our EBITDA guidance of about $20 million of incremental EBITDA related to the tax credit. So the other thing I guess I would mention to kind of help a little bit is, we've always said commercially that we would maintain a significant majority of the tax credit. And what we have included in our EBITDA guidance reflects that. So when we refer to the EBITDA pick up we're talking about a net benefit to EBITDA. So from an accounting perspective, the gross credit will flow through cost of sales. And anything that we've negotiated commercially would be a slight deduct to revenue. But as we've said, we're retaining the significant majority of the credit. And from a MAP perspective, I think many people are familiar that $0.03 for installed watt that is the credit that we are a beneficiary of. And today, the average megawatt per installed power is somewhere around three million. So I think I'll probably stop there that's probably the extent of what I could give from a perspective 2023 relative to 2022, a slight decline in volume. But then as we think about our backlog, we certainly -- we had the long-term order with the New Mexico facility that extends our backlog into 2028. Right now based on the backlog we have in place 2024 and 2025 are the higher years. And then you have the New Mexico facility filling out in the last three years there is that's helpful.

Yeah. Gail, if I could just quickly follow on that. You've given that there's still some uncertainty still weighing IRS guidelines you've obviously got these commercial arrangements. Is it fair to kind of think that this outlook you put out for this year just related to the credit kind of your most conservative approach and you're still trying to kind of fine-tune these things?

I'd say Brent I mentioned the variables. Certainly units produced. We feel pretty good about our backlog. There's always some wiggle room there. Nearer term, we feel a little bit more confident about the size of the turbine. So those things feel relatively certain. I'd say looking at it could there be a little bit of conservatism, since there hasn't been finalization in the rules? Yeah, I would say that there is a little bit. But we've really tried to put our best foot forward in giving a sense of what we expect for the year.

Yeah. Okay. All right. Thanks for that follow-up. I appreciate that. I’ll pass it on.

One comment on the tax rate. There are a lot rules that we expect. I think the main thing that we're waiting for -- there's of course, how it's going to be -- when it starts and things like that. But the most important piece is the rule of -- by America. What does it mean? And that's the piece that we are waiting for that needs to be clarifnied more specifically. And the main reason is that this thing is being bundled between wind and solar and they are very different industries. But what we're trying to do here is the wind tower industry as you saw with the New Mexico plant, there is no capacity. And if not we can build it. it's something we can do really fast and we're willing to do it and it's not also someone else, but there is capacity. The solar industry is in a very different position, so I think that's what we are waiting for the IRS to make sure that we put our best argument forward that these are not the same thing. And I think we're doing that and the industry is doing that.

Interesting point. Thank you, Antonio.

Thank you.

And we'll take our last question from Ian Zaffino with Oppenheimer.

Hi, great. Thank you very much. I just wanted to kind of ask one more question on the tax credits. How do you think about and I know you touched on this a little bit but how are you thinking about pricing in this business? Are you going to price it so that the unit is quite even? And then all your EBITDA would come from the uplift of the AMP, or do you think you're going to be able -- you're going to run the business as a standalone profitable and then you'd take the AMP on top of that? I'm just trying to -- I know maybe because thinking about the sharing of this and how it all works. So, I'm just trying to understand particularly what your pricing might be or how you think about the business given that the AMP kind of comes back to or maybe not come back--?

Sure. That's -- it's a really good question. And let me split it in two pieces. And let's put 2023 aside. So, 2023 -- think about the pricing we have for 2023. We priced this thing in almost of last year when the Inflation Reduction Act was being approved. And we thought it would take 12 to 18 months for it to get started. So, we priced this year based on the assumptions we need to keep our people, we need to keep the plants operating, we need to keep our capacity because it's going to get really good after 2023. So, the pricing this year is not reflective of the way we're pricing our towers going forward. The business needs to be profitable by itself. And we will see the tax rate as additive to our margins. Will we be able to keep 100% of it? We've already said we are giving some to our customers but the majority we will keep. So, the idea of the business is to have strong margins in the business and add the tax rate on top of that.

Okay that makes sense. And then on the barge side can you give us a little bit color between dry and liquid? I don't know if you mentioned that I can't find it anywhere Maybe you cut some of the dynamics there. Thanks.

Sure. Most of our owners right now are a dry cargo barge. And the market where we are seeing really pent-up demand is in the dry cargo barge. That's the market that's been slower for the longest period of time. That's where the aging of the barges is higher. But we are seeing -- so most of the demand we're seeing and most of the barges we're getting are dry cargo. We are getting some smaller liquid barges, [indiscernible] we call them those are more for petrochemical. But believe it or not we're seeing some demand for the larger liquid barges and for some more smaller liquid barges. So, we are seeing the markets out there. And when you see the utilization rates of the liquid barges are very high, the fleet is not as old as the dry cargo, but it's getting there. And it's not old on average but -- you have some very new barges and you have some very old barges. So there is replacement that's going to happen. In the liquid may be not as strong as the dry cargo, but it's happening. So probably over the next year or so where you will see us grow the most is in dry cargo.

Okay. And then if I could just sneak one more in. So, I guess, the way I'm looking at this is construction is doing quite well barges is really coming out of its trough. Wind towers is really, sort of, a benefit here. So those are three big important growing businesses. But then you have a couple of other businesses that are much smaller. And, especially, as these three businesses continue get larger relatively speaking those other businesses become smaller. I know you got rid of the storage tank business. Are there any plans to get rid of some of these other called non-core businesses? I know you've talked about it before. But given the strength that you're seeing across these other call it three segments does that encourage you or kind of increase your desire to shed some of those businesses? Thanks.

Sure. No I think we've been very clear that we will simplify the company as the businesses get ready to -- and have become let's say in an attractive position to be disposed of. So we have been clear about that. There are certain things that need to happen for each business to be ready. I've been clear that I don't expect to sell them at the peak of their cycles. So I think -- like I've always said M&A has -- takes a life of its own. But we are we're going to continue to push the idea that this company is too complex for our size and we're going to continue to simplify it monetize some assets and continue to reinvest in our growth business especially on M&A and construction and organic in construction and engineered structures. So that's what's going to continue to happen. Timing I cannot tell you but it's up there in our main priorities.

Okay. Thank you very much.

Thank you. It appears that we have no further questions at this time. I will now turn the program back over to our presenters for any additional or closing remarks.

Thank you for joining us today and we look forward to speaking to you again next quarter.

That concludes today's teleconference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.