Good morning, and welcome to the Arcosa, Inc. Second Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Gretchen, and I will be your conference call coordinator today. A copy of yesterday's press release and the slide presentation for this morning's call are posted on the Investor Relations website www.ir.arcosa.com. All participants are now in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the company's prepared remarks. As a reminder, today's call is being recorded. Instructions for accessing the replay number are included in the press release. A replay of the webcast will be available for one year on the company's website Now I would like to turn the call over to your host, Gail Peck, CFO for Arcosa. Ms. Peck you may begin

Good morning, everyone and thank you for joining Arcosa's second quarter 2021 earnings call. With me today is Antonio Carrillo, President and CEO. Let me begin with an important reminder; today's comments and presentation slides contain financial measures that have not been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to the closest GAAP measure are included in the appendix of the slide presentation. In addition today's conference call contains forward-looking statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements. Please refer to the company's SEC filings for more information on these risks and uncertainties, including the press release we filed yesterday and our Form 10 Q expected to be filed later today. Antonio will begin today's call with a discussion of our overall second quarter performance and the acquisition of Southwest Rock products that we were pleased to announce in yesterday's release. I would now like to turn the call over to Antonio. Okay.

Thank you, Gail. Good morning and thank you for joining today's call. Starting on Slide four. Arcosa executed well in the second quarter, generating 3% revenue growth over the prior year and reporting adjusted EBITDA in line with last year's record. Despite the headwinds we faced in the quarter our solid financial performance underscores the resilience of our business and the benefit of strategic investments we have made to expand our business into attractive new markets. Let me discuss a few key takeaways from the quarter. The construction products business, which now represents more than 50% of our adjusted EBITDA continues to benefit from strong activity and the outlook remains positive. The segment generated 17% growth in the second quarter adjusted EBITDA even after the impact of excessive rainfall. We're managing our continued steel price inflation through proactive price increases across our operations. However, in our barge business, and to a lesser extent, wind towers, high steel prices are limiting the conversion of inquiries into new orders, weighing on our near term expectations for this business. Engineered Structures continues to experience a healthy level of order activity driven by three key trends: increased utility spending to improve the reliability of the electric grid, the connection of renewable energy sources to the power grid and continued federal and state investments in road infrastructure. Finally, I'm excited to announce today our acquisition of Southwest Rock Products, the transaction which follows our purchase of StonePoint Materials this past April exemplifies how we are successfully executing on our long-term strategy by evolving our portfolio towards higher margins, faster growth and less cyclical products. Turning to Slide Seven, let's look at our consolidated results for the second quarter. Revenue increased 3% from the prior year, reflecting strengthen in our construction products and engineered structural segments,…

Thank you, Antonio. I'll start on Slide 10 and review our segment results from the second quarter. Construction Products' revenue grew 38% and adjusted EBITDA increased 17% led by the contribution from the StonePoint acquisition that closed in early April. Segment EBITDA margin was 22.1% down from 26% a year ago. There were several factors driving the margin decline. As Antonio noted, excessive rainfall in Texas, our largest exposure and along the Gulf coast reduced segment adjusted EBITDA by approximately $3 million to $4 million in the quarter. Construction activity returned to healthy levels in June, once the weather improved. We had strong shipment levels on days not impacted by wet weather, but overall volumes were lower than expected due to rainfall. Higher diesel costs also impacted margins for the quarter. Lastly, the inclusion of StonePoint was also dilutive to margins as we now include their revenues on a gross basis, inclusive of pass-through freight in line with our legacy businesses. We experienced pricing gains across most markets supported by strengthening product demand and attractive fundamentals. Mid-year price increases have also been announced, which should provide further support heading into next year. Our two businesses that were most impacted by COVID lightweight aggregates and trench shoring products generated strong results during the quarter with EBITDA above year ago levels and demand tracking at a pre-pandemic pace. The integration of StonePoint is advancing well, and our synergy realization is progressing as planned. Despite adverse weather in the second quarter StonePoint is on track to meet our adjusted EBITDA expectations for 2021. The integration into our legacy Texas and Louisiana footprint is well underway and nearly complete from an operational standpoint. A focus area going forward is systems integration as we move to consolidate our entire construction materials platform on to one…

Thank you, Gail. Please turn to slide 15. As Gail discuss, Arcosa delivered solely Q2 results led by growth in our construction products and engineered structure businesses, despite the impact of abnormally wet weather in our largest market and continued softness in our transportation product segment. The outlook for construction remains positive driven by strong demand for aggregates in our key markets in Texas as well as Tennessee and solid recovery of our specialty materials and shoring products. And then as we continue to see it's Pennsylvania, where we have some exposure to natural gas infrastructure spending. Overall, we expect a strong second half for our construction product segment reflecting continued positive market fundamentals, favorable pricing and positive contribution from our two new recent acquisitions. In our Engineered Structure segment, we expect to see year over year growth in the second half of the year in most of our businesses. In utility structures, we are seeing strong demand as our customers direct capital spending towards electric grid hardening and reliability projects. Department of transportation spending in Florida and throughout the Southeast remains favorable leading to healthy order growth and racing customer demand for our traffic structures, while telecom customers continue to build out 5G networks. In our storage tank business, we are experiencing strong pricing power, giving steady demand, primarily reflecting continued housing market growth and the trend towards the organization. In our wind tower business we have seen a recent falls in new orders in light of growing uncertainty surrounding potential extension of the US potential bank's credit for new wind farm developments. High steel prices and a late June expansion of the PTC for wind farms currently under construction, have also contributed to the delay in customer decisions. As a result, our own sole production slots for the…

[Operator instructions] And we'll take our first question from Ian Zaffino from Oppenheimer. Your line is open, please go ahead.

Thank you very much. Just kind of wanted to ask you about the barge business on the steel side, is there a magic number steel needs to fall to that you think is going to improve the order flow? Is it a matter of just seeing directionally that it's going down? Does it need to fall below a threshold? How do you kind of think about that?

Thank you, Ian. Let me try to give you some more color around this issue. So as you saw in the quarter, even at these levels, we sold barges. We had a nice barge and ordered a few large barge orders and the problem selling at this price is that the margins are low. So I think that it's not about a magic number. Every forecast that you see out there, or most of the forecast that I've seen show price for steel slowing down sometime late this year, early next year. And what happens then is we have -- there's two pieces here. One is we have to make sure that -- I don't think prices will go down to $500 that we were seeing last year because the economy was shut down. But at the same time, I don’t think the prices should stay at $1,700. There is a bunch of capacity coming online in 2022, both on the coil and the plate side. And that will lead us to believe that there's going to be a price reduction at some point in time. So I think two things need to happen. First customers need to understand that we're not seeing $500 again in the near term. And second, the conditions, there's two different markets here, the dry cargo barge market and the liquid cargo market, and they are different stages in their cycles. On the dry cargo side, everything looks very positive for significant orders to come back. There has been very low replacement of barges over the last four, five years. There is a lot of scrapping going on with high scrap prices at this moment. There's a lot of scrapping of barges happening. So everything seems to be pointing to a very robust comeback of…

Okay, great. And then, the second question would be maybe it's just like a little bit of a two-part question, but I wanted to ask you about guidance because unchanged here in the EBITDA line. But then you're adding in StonePoint. So kind of help us understand, maybe your outlook for aggregates is similar to what you were originally thinking. It seems that way, but also maybe you could unpack your comments about the FAST Act extension, or maybe [Indiscernible] around infrastructure bill discussion as well and how that would help the construction products business. Thanks.

Yeah, good morning, Ian. This is Gail. Let me, take the first part of that and maybe I'll turn it back over to Antonio for the FAST Act implications. You know, on the guidance topic, as you pointed out, we did maintain our guidance range of $270 million to $290 million of EBITDA. Essentially looking at it in total there were some goes in and goes out that balanced out within the range. We're pleased to see the full year EBITDA still tracking on pace with last year's strong results. And that's despite more than a $50 million headwind year over year that we're having from transportation products. Some of the minus is clearly where the impact of steel continuing to press higher ahead of our expectations, that's impacted our order decisions, customer's orders decisions, as Antonio said on barge and wind tower customers. So leaving some production slots unfilled in the fourth quarter. Adverse weather clearly impacted construction. We know weather is always a variable, but the rain we had this past quarter was excessive. But to your question and outlook for construction remains very much intact. We had a very strong June with -- when the weather is normal and dry we're very pleased with what we're seeing. To the plus, we also had the wind tower settlement and then the earnings coming from Southwest Rock. But the net of all of these essentially I think, is falling within the range and we're very excited about keeping our guidance maintained.

Ian the second piece, just to clarify also on the guidance, StonePoint was already in our guidance in the previous quarter. What we added was Southwest Rock and you see the number in the presentation itself summarizing $4 million to $5 million that we added to the guidance, but we subtracted the barge, barge piece. So as Gail said, we are very pleased with our construction segment. We had a very, very, very wet April and especially May in Houston and in Dallas and that slowed us down. We gave a number of $3 million to $4 million of impact for the quarter. But when the rain subsided and it became a more normal weather pattern, we saw incredible demand come back and we had a very, very strong June with very strong margins. We saw pricing power to push through our costs. So we were very pleased with the rebound in June, and we see very strong backlog, some very strong demand in most of the regions where we operate. So the FAST Act, it has to be extended; we expect it to be extended, hopefully at a higher level. But what we're seeing both with the FAST Act and with the infrastructure packets has been discussed, I think those are really good things, but we are seeing very strong demand at the moment with or without them. So I'm, very encouraged by what we're seeing in the market and we're very happy with the performance of our Construction Products segment, especially also now that the other two pieces of the segment, which were shoring and specialty materials have recovered very well. We saw very nice pricing and very nice volumes for the quarter.

We'll take our next question from Brent Thielman from DA Davidson. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. Antonio, it looks like you've been able to manage through this the steel environment pretty well in the energy structures business. Can we continue to expect this level of margin performance, I guess X the customer dispute, ended the second half and I guess going forward, I guess what I'm asking is there any catch up and higher steel prices or some of these supply chain constraints that might impact the segment going forward?

It's a really good question. I think we've been doing very well with it. I think in the previous call I described, our three types of businesses we have and let me try to describe them again. Each one has their own special circumstances. So we have, I'd tell you the one that we've been really spending most of our time is our Engineered Structures, our transmission business, where we have contracts with customers that allow us to pass through the cost, the additional cost of steel, but they allow us to do it normally with some delay. So there is some revisions that happen depending on the contract, monthly, quarterly, etcetera. So what you're seeing, we are already -- we have those impacts already in our margins today. So we've been absorbing part of that increase through the delay. So as we -- price of steel has continued to go up, but in much smaller numbers. So I think now we're a relatively stable place in steel prices. So I think the margins should start normalizing and we should start seeing probably some positive momentum in our utility structured business. The second part is -- the second piece of the products that we produce is the ones that we make -- build towards or no. So those are our tanks. And on the tank side, as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, we're seeing very, very strong pricing power. There's a lot of demand for tanks. We are at a low -- normally during the summer, there's not a lot of demand for tanks and we're seeing incredible demand. Our backlogs are very strong and pricing is very, very strong. So we're very happy with what we're seeing in our tank business. The third piece is wind towers and barges, which are contracted prices. So we normally sell the towers or the barges and we have a contract of steel attached to it. And there's a password and I'm not concerned about those margins related to the contracts. So I'd tell you if anything we have some positive momentum on the utility structure and tanks, the other ones I'm not concerned about. I don't see any supply issues in terms of volumes, but remember that we have said in our remarks that we will -- we are pushing some of the wind tower and barge volume to 2022. So you will see some reduced volumes in the second half of the year to try to maintain our flexibility and what you will see the impact of that margin because of that, not because we're seeing, we cannot manage our cost is simply because the volume is going to come down a little bit there.

Okay. I appreciate that. And then I guess the second question would be on the acquisition you just completed Southwest, it looks like it produces exceptionally high margins relative to your core construction product segment. Is there something in particular they're doing or just a really strong environment in Phoenix right now, any color that would be helpful?

Sure. And I'll give you probably a bigger picture. We've mentioned in our calls before and the meetings with the analyst, the next stage for our growth that we developed probably a year and a half ago, first stage was growing Texas and adjacencies and then we worked on this strategic plan to a metropolitan areas would be our next stages for growth. And that's why we came up with StonePoint and Arizona was in what, in that list of metropolitan areas. When we evaluate metropolitan areas, we go through a reverse analysis of why we like them, and there's many things including population growth and infrastructure spending, but also what's the competitive environment in that region. And those are the things that make the metropolitan areas have better or worse market conditions. I think Arizona and Phoenix specifically in that region has all those things looking very positive. We like the mark. We like the population growth. We like the infrastructure spending. We like the competitive environment there and all of those things are shown in the margin. And that's why when we look at our long-term strategy, we say, we want to grow in attractive markets with competitive advantages. I think that's how they get reflected in the margin. So we like Phoenix, it has great conditions and the margin is high. One of the things I would tell you is that as a public company, when we come in, we normally add some costs because simply our reporting and things, we will probably drive that margin a little down based on adding a few additional controls over that operation, but it's not major, but it's something we normally -- we normally see, but at very attractive, very good acquisition. Great market.

We'll take our next question from Julio Romero from Sidoti. Your line is open. Go ahead.

I just wanted to follow up on the last question from Brent there on the trailing 12 month margins for Southwest Rock, it looks really strong and I don't know if you can speak to the -- I want to dig a little more on the kind of margins you expect Southwest to contribute to Arcosa, is there a ramp to get to 39%? Is there upside to 39%? And just to kind of help us understand, what are normalized margins for Southwest kind of when it's under the Arcosa umbrella?

Julio, this is Antonio, as you know, we just closed on it yesterday and it was a process that we started a few months ago. As I said in my remarks this acquisition was in the pipeline coming from StonePoint. So we bought StonePoint in April and we're in August closing this one. So the margins have been relatively steady for them for the last several quarters. So it's not something that it's a unique circumstances. They perform very well over the last several, several quarters. They have different -- they have sand and gravel and they also have hard rock, but what I'd like to offer to you that we're going to take the operation off and understand it well, understand what additional costs we're going to have to add to simply before control -- for our control environment and maybe come back to you with some additional color on the margins. We do not expect a significant reduction, but I will say that -- and we've seen that in Dallas at some points in times when there's high demand, we can get to the 39%, 40%. But in the long term, I think the margins should be more in line with our peers. They should be probably in the mid thirties in that region. I think the 39% would be the higher end of the range that I would give you for that operation.

Great. Thank you for the color there. And I guess my second question is just on barge. Can you maybe give a little more granularity on the evolution of customer thinking about capital deployment for barges? I'm just, I would think there's a reasonable expectation that maybe steel, might even go off from here. So, I just wanted to kind of ask about how customers are thinking? Are some customers capitulating, are some still holding out and has that mix of customers, accepting the new normal steel versus holding out evolved at all in the last six, nine months.

Yes, that's a good question. So as you, as you can imagine, steel prices on the acceptance of steel price really has to do with our customer's business model and let me give you a couple of examples. On the utility structures, our customers are able to pass that additional steel cost through their tariffs to the customers. In the case of barges, it's a different scenario. There's relatively established barge rates for the river system. And when you plug those barge rates in the river system that allows you to calculate how much you can pay for a barge. And those are the things that don't move overnight. So I think if the steel prices are staying at this levels over the medium or long term, which I don't believe they're going to stay at this level, but they're going to be higher than they were in the past. There needs to be some adjustment to the tariffs in the river system, for them to be able to invest. And that should happen. It just takes longer time. And that's the mental aspect that they're going through. How much can I pay for a barges based on the rates in the river at the moment? That's one. The other one is the demand side. How many barges are idle and how many barges are being used. On the dry cargo side, I will tell you the river is busy, there's a lot of movement. Of course, right now it's not the main crop season, but it's going to get busy soon and everything points out to be a very strong market coming from the grain side. The coal, believe it or not, the coal, the coal market, has been busy with natural prices going up. There's a lot of…

Thank you. I like long answers. So I appreciate that. And thanks for taking the questions and congrats again on the acquisition.

We'll take our next question from Stefanos Crist from CJS. Your line is open. Please. Go ahead.

Good morning and congrats on the quarter. Could you, on aggregates, can you give us some more color on pricing and volume and then what organic growth is built into your guidance?

Good morning Stefanos. This is Gail. Yeah, sure I'll take that one. On the volume side, clearly we had the weather impact. So when weather was dry, our volume was tracking ahead. I think as I mentioned earlier, we saw a strong aggregates volume growth in June and unit profitability. So, encouraged with the attractive fundamentals, encouraged with our ability to drive price in most markets. We had price increases early in the year and we implemented additional mid-year pricing increases. So good momentum on the pricing side, I'd say very much in line with the market and our peers on that front. So weather being the biggest impact on natural and recycled aggregates. Really kind of moving away from aggregates for a bit, our specialty materials and trend shoring, they're more nationwide businesses and not as impacted by the localized weather effects in Texas and on the Coast that we had. So we saw strong lightweight volumes, with demand, as I mentioned that at pre pandemic pace. So very encouraged with what we're seeing there, the ability to drive price there as well, and same on our trend shoring side. So all in all on a quarter perspective coming back to aggregates, ex the addition of StonePoints so clearly we had good growth in volumes with the quarter with bringing StonePoint into the portfolio. We did see volume growth. I'd attribute that some to some bolt-ons that we completed late in the year, last year, but we did see a small amount of organic growth despite the weather.

Yeah. And Stefanos this is Antonio. One more thing that we did not touch on the remarks but the other thing that we saw in the quarter was there was a, one of the bottlenecks in the industry specifically in Texas, was there was a cement allocations. After the storms in February, there was a shutdown of a couple of cement plants that created a significant problem with the cement industry here in Texas. And there were allocations. We consume cement in our specialty materials in our cherry business, but also a lot of our customers, which are the ready mix companies that buy cement, were in allocation. So that created a bottleneck for the quarter and that allocation has gone away. There's imports coming into the Port of Houston and others, and there is no allocation anymore. So I think we should be a much more conducive environment in the second half of the year to be able to grow organically in Texas.

That's great color. Thank you. And then just on the Southwest acquisition, it is a strategy going forward to build more in Phoenix, or do you think, the strategy is more focused on finding other metropolitan areas? How should investors think about that?

Yes, that's a great question. As I've said, in my prepared remarks, I think we've done a lot of acquisitions. We've used our balance sheet to a point where we feel very comfortable where we are. As Gail said in her prepared remarks, we're measuring 2.4 times after the acquisition and net debt to EBITDA but at a very low point in our cyclical businesses, the barge and rail components, etcetera. So we're very comfortable where we are, but at the same time, our focus over the next few quarters is going to be finishing the integration of this acquisitions. We have a lot of things to do there, extracting all the value from them, making sure we fund them well. We understand their needs and their organic needs also. All of them come with very strong management teams, but also with a lot of ideas of how to grow organically. And when we put all those ideas together, we have -- the good news is we have a lot of projects that we can choose to continue to allocate capital. So over the next few quarters, I think you should see us allocate capital to finishing the integration. Organic growth, we have some very nice organic projects that are getting to be finished. And then the way you should see each one of our platforms, Phoenix, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, Texas, is there going to be some bolt-ons around them? Normally, we've been able to find those bolt-ons at relatively attractive prices, easy to integrate and they allow us to grow faster. And you'll see us do that before we jump into another metropolitan area. Those are larger and we need to generate cash to be able to do that again. So the short term is more on this bolt-on organic growth and integration.

Our next question comes from Justin Bergner from Gabelli Funds. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

A few questions on Southwest, some quick ones first was it in auction? Second, what would you say is its competitive advantage and third, given sort of the low revenue per ton, sort of what's the backdrop there, is it low transportation costs and what are the CapEx needs?

Yes, let me take a stab. So, there was not a process. As I said, when we bought StonePoint, they have developed a relationship with the majority shareholder and they were already in talks and we were able to let's say, continue building that trust with the owner and with the management team. And we, I think, we reached a good agreement with the shareholders. So it was not a process and that's what we like. We normally -- we prefer acquisitions where there's not a process involved. And so we were very happy with that piece. The company has the competitive advantage, I would say like every other, like every other aggregates businesses, their location or where the reserves are. It's always the biggest thing and they have really good locations. They've been in that market forever. Both the owner and the operator and the management team are very experienced in the region, very experienced in the area. We're inheriting a very capable management team that knows the area very well. And it comes down to location and that's the competitive advantage. Also they have incredibly well kept and well run operations. When you go there, I can tell you I've seen a lot and these are as good as it gets. They had an incredible clean, well-maintained, well capitalized business. We do not see significant need for any CapEx. Like always, what you should see us do in Phoenix, like in all the areas, our focus is going to be as we grow this business or continue to find reserves and look for additional growth in the region but overall, no big needs for CapEx.

Yeah. Justin, I would say this is Gail, I would say on the CapEx front, their historical run rate's been about $3 million to $4 million a year. From an equipment and property plant perspective in fabulous shape, they've been investing in the company, keeping up on maintenance. So we really don't see anything near term other than their normal annual needs from a CapEx perspective.

Great. Thank you. And one other question, if I may I know you discussed sort of input cost pressures in regards to steel earlier, but is it safe to say that considering the puts and takes to your maintained, $270 million $290 million EBITDA guidance, the increased cost pressure is not, one of the headwinds or larger headwinds in the current guidance than when it was sort of updated or maintained a quarter ago, or has cost pressure become more of a headwind in your maintained guide?

No, I think you're right. I think we've been able to manage the cost pressure well, and I think we've found, we are let's say we found the way to do it and do it well. And our team is doing a fantastic job, passing those through. The thing, the biggest headwind for us is volume in barges and wind towers. Those are the two headwinds for the second quarter. We believe they are temporary and they are going to come back. And the good news is we built an incredible platform. Our construction segment is the size of Arcosa in terms of EBITDA when we spent 2.5 years ago. So we build a very strong base and when this cyclical business has come back, we've mentioned the rail components is coming back and we're going to start seeing that in the second half, little by little. So I think I'm very comfortable where we are. Happy with what we see for the future and I'm happy with the way we're passing through the price increases. And once we solve this steel issue of hitting our customers volumes, I think we're going to be in a really nice truck.

Thank you. Best of luck in the second half.

And it appears that we have no further questions at this time. I will now turn the program back over to Gail for any additional or closing remarks.

Thank you, Gretchen, and thank you everyone for joining us today. We look forward to speaking with you again next quarter.

This does conclude today's program. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect at any time.