Nicole Stokes
Analyst · Janney Montgomery Scott. Go ahead
Great. Thank you, Palmer. For the second quarter, we've reported net income of $32.2 million or $0.47 per diluted share. As Palmer mentioned, this includes $88 million of provision for loan loss expense, primarily related to the update of our economic forecasts and not related to any specific credits within our portfolio. On an adjusted basis, we earned $42.4 million or $0.61 per share, when you exclude the merger restructuring charges, servicing asset impairment, COVID-19 expenses, legal fees from the ongoing SEC investigation, and the loss on the sale of bank premises. Our adjusted return on assets in the second quarter was 89, which was a slight increase from the 87 reported last quarter, and our adjusted return on tangible common equity was 11.66% compared to 10.98%. Both of these ratios are less than historical levels due to the increased provision for loan loss expense. Tangible book value increased $0.46 from 20.44 to 20.90 during the quarter. Our tangible common equity ratio decreased 55 basis points to 7.70 from 8.25 from the end of last quarter; however, the asset growth from PPP loans negatively impacted that by 45 basis points. So, excluding the PPP loans from total assets, our TCE ratio would have been 8.15 at June 30. We were extremely pleased with our positive rebound in the margin this quarter. Our net interest margin improved by 13 basis points from 3.70 to 3.83 during the quarter, as we were successful and quickly reducing funding cost. During the quarter, our yield on earning assets declined by 25 basis points, but our funding costs decreased by 49 basis points, and our total interest bearing deposit costs decreased 43 basis points, as we continue to stay focused on our pricing, and we really didn't see the competitive delay with the March Fed cuts that we've seen in the past. We saw an increase in accretive income compared to last quarter because of some payoffs in the Fidelity portfolio that we don't anticipate to recur in the future quarters. Our core bank production yields declined at 4.16 for the quarter against 4.55 last quarter. And on the deposit side, we continue the momentum on non-interest bearing deposits and improved our mix such that non-interest bearing now represents 35.89% of our total deposits compared to 30.3 at the end of last quarter and 28.9 this time last year. A large portion of the increase is related to PPP deposit and we anticipate this gradually running off and we model that in our outlook modeling. As I previously mentioned, our second quarter provision expense was $88 million, approximately $68 million of that was related to loan loss and $20 million was an increase for unfunded commitments. We had approximately $9.2 million of our net charge offs for the quarter. Our ending allowance for loan loss in June 30th was $208.8 million compared to 149 at the end of last quarter and $38 million at the end of the year. If you add in the un-funded commitments reserve, our total allowance for credit losses was $240 6 million at the end of the quarter compared to 167 at the end of the first quarter and $39 million at the end of last year. Moving on, our close and non-interest income was exceptional during the second quarter. Our mortgage group had record production efficiency and earnings due to the interest rate environment. Mortgage production hit record levels at just over 2.6 billion for the quarter, and the gain on sale increased to over three and a half percent, up from 2.88 last quarter. Net income in the retail mortgage division increased to $53.5 million for the quarter. Total non-interest expense were $155.8 million for the quarter; however, when you remove the COVID-19 expenses the merger restructure, the fees, the attorney fees on the SEC investigation and the loss of federal branches, our adjusted non-interest expense totaled $149 million, that was up $14.7 million from last quarter. However, expenses in the retail mortgage segment increased $20.8 million due to the variable costs associated with the increased volume such as commissions. So as you can see on Slide 11, all of the increase in expenses are related to the lines of business and are more than offset by increased revenue. And as we expected and as we discussed on this call last quarter excluding the lines of business, our expensive in the core bank and administrative functions decreased by 7.4 million during the quarter. This led us to be extremely pleased with our efficiency ratio. Our adjusted efficiency ratio improved to 51.08 compared to 59.87 last quarter. The increase in mortgage revenue and the efficiency gain in the mortgage division significantly impacted this ratio, and we do believe the ratio will increase slightly in future quarters, as we don't anticipate this level of mortgage revenue and efficiency to be sustainable. As Palmer mentioned, we've identified several areas for additional cost sides, we've identified nine branches that will be closing in the third quarter. We've identified several branches that will remain as drive-through only after the pandemic ends, and we're often have an initiative to reduce our lease expense on non-retail banking offices that we can eliminate or consolidate into other facilities. This is -- all of this is in addition to the 14 branches that we've already closed from the Fidelity acquisition. We've already terminated or negotiated out of 11 lease spaces for an annual cost saves of over $1.5 million going forward, and we continue to look for more opportunities. We've initiated an employee incentive program to share in the cost saves to really drive the cost saves culture with our new employees. We view these cost saves as a way for us to pay for the growth and technology and innovation going forward, while we can maintain our efficiency ratio in the mid to low-50s. On the balance sheet side, we were pleased with organic growth both on the loan and deposit side. Loan growth this quarter was 1.4 billion, including the 1.1 billion of PPP loans. So excluding those loans, our organic loan growth was about 384 million, that's about just over 11% annualized. However, approximately half of that loan growth was seasonal growth in our warehouse and ag line, which we anticipate will normalize later in the year and bring our loan growth back in line with our estimates of about 7% for the year. More details of our loan production can be found on Slide 21 and 22 in the investor presentation. Our total deposits increased by 1.7 billion during the quarter, of which 1.4 billion was a non-interest bearing and was positively impacted by PPP deposit as we discussed earlier. Our loan to deposit ratio ended at 93% compared to 94.6% at the end of the first quarter. As Palmer mentioned, we continue to be well capitalized, we feel comfortable with our capital level and our liquidity position remains strong. And with that, I'll turn it over to Palmer for closing comments for the Q&A.