Dennis Zember
Analyst · KBW. Please go ahead
All right. Thank you, Ed. Like I said earlier, I’ll be referencing the financial highlights in the slides that we published, as I’ll give you some more detail on the quarter. Let’s start on the -- our net interest income and the margin. For the quarter, we’re reporting $62.1 million tax equivalent net interest income, which is up about $3.2 million against the linked-quarter and up almost $11 million against the year ago period. Like Ed said that, against the linked-quarter, we really benefited from the boost that we got on the portfolio of United State premium finance, which is -- which more than offset the impact of a shorter quarter. Our margin excluding accretion income moved higher by 6 basis points, which was a combination of several events. Ed mentioned the impact that US premium finance gave us was about 7 basis points. We believe that impact is, yeah, that’s we believe -- that’s the impact that we’ll see going forward. The capital rate raise and debt offering happened in the last months of the quarter. So the negative margin impact of this came in at only about 2 basis points. We’ve been saying that the capital raise and debt offering would be about 5 basis points to 6 basis points dilutive to the margin. But I’ve been using an investment rate of about 3%, which is probably low, given the growth forecast we have. We think we may be able to neutralize that impact of that by the third quarter or fourth quarter. Lastly, the -- we had a slightly better earning asset mix with a little more concentrated in loans, which gave us about 1 basis point in the margin. We’re not really seeing a tremendous amount of deposit pricing pressure yet, which I believe is driven by the industry seeing flat asset yield opportunities relative to where we were 50 basis points ago on fed funds. On incremental deposit opportunities, we are being creative and aggressive knowing that we expect meaningful growth in the next couple quarters. Essentially our position is that we don’t need margin expansion to hit our earnings numbers and to the extent that we get a lift in revenues from rate increases, we are using that to be as aggressive as we can to move the needle on funding. The provision was higher this quarter against last year, but total credit cost came in at about $2.7 million, which is pretty consistent with where we’ve been. The OREO and resolution side of this continues to espouse, while our provision moves higher with the faster pace of loan growth. Non-interest income in the quarter was higher by $1.4 million. Thanks to a rebound in mortgage revenues. The first quarter of the year is always pretty tough on mortgage as we build pipeline, but the sentiment has been pretty negative on the industry for most of the quarter. So we’ve been watching mortgage revenues pretty closely. In the ENT parts of our strategy in mortgage we produced pretty solid results. First, the focus consistently being on being very reliable for our builders and our brokers, meant, that the flow of business that we saw was more reliable than what the industry experienced. Secondly, the Southeastern markets where we originate are strong and grown, and that we are benefiting from that. We mentioned that we became a Ginnie Mae qualified issuer in the quarter, which is very important given the expertise we have in government lending. During the first quarter, about 38% of our production was government-oriented compared to about 39% for all of last year. The revenue pickup from being Ginnie Mae approved varies depending on the market, but right now we’re seeing about a 50 basis-point pickup in revenues from being Ginnie Mae cost. But we think -- with Ginnie Mae approved, we think that we will be ready to pick up some of that revenue probably by the third quarter. Our SBA group had a great quarter with about $18.4 million in sold loans which pushed net income in the group to $1.2 million. The pipeline is pretty strong at about $55 million and even more encouraging we made few new hires during the quarter bringing our total sales staff to 12 at the end of March. Our gain percentage was up by here two, which is encouraging to a 111.4%, compared to a 110.7% for all of 2016. Our partnership with U.S. premium finance delivered exactly what we had forecasted. Financially it was very reliable and profitable. We grew assets in this division from about $360 million at the end of the year to about $437 million at the end of the first quarter. Outside of the financial aspects of this business, we are really pleased with the processes, the quality, the sales, and administrative staff and the leadership in this group. While we are only three months into the agreement we see all of the foundational parts that we need to lead us to believe we can hit or exceed the growth targets we have for this loan business. On the expense side, I’m temporarily pleased by getting an efficiency ratio with the five handle, I’m kidding. But in the quarter we did come in 59.7%, but in March alone we were at 58.8%. So we feel like we’ve got some room between where we are now in 60%. I mean having done this in the first quarter of the year when spread income suffers from slower production and a shorter quarter. Last year, I had the confidence that we can hold the line on this efficiency level and found ourselves with some room to invest in the business, either on the production side or in administrative centers that may need some additional resources as we approached $10 billion. On the balance sheet side, Ed covered most of it, but we had core loan growth of $98.5 million or about 8.5% annualized. That, I know, this is lower than what we have forecast, but we’re still confident with respect to the kind of growth we expect in 2017. The first quarter was impacted by pay downs in mortgage warehouse that are kind of, I’m noticing that are industry-wide. Our pay downs were about $80 million, which is not the normal level of pay downs that you expect between the end of the year and the first quarter. Some of this is the slower refinance market that is impacting mortgage industry volumes and usage on our lines. We believe the fourth quarter outstandings were impacted by about 75-basis point spike in the team here, right after the election that got a lot of borrowers off the fence and really feel that our warehouse lines. Going forward, we expect that at a minimum we can sustain the current level of production and balances that you saw this quarter. So, we don’t think this will be a story in the second quarter, third quarter or fourth quarter. On the equipment finance side, we built a significant pipeline. We hired the staff. We got everybody integrated. The pipeline looks really promising for the next quarter or so. While we finished with just $5 million closed in this division, just seeing the pipeline and the kind of business that’s coming across, we are confident we’re going to hit the numbers we forecasted, which is $200 million to $250 million in this division by the end of this year. Commercial side was very solid on both production and outstanding. Total production increased to $513 million. That’s up about 20%, 25% from year ago, $416 million. We are benefiting to some degree from commercial construction commitments that we made last year, that are starting to fund up as well as new business. We saw flat yields on fixed rate production, which is not surprising, where the long end of the curve is, but we did see variable rate production tick-up about 36 basis points, which was encouraging. And wherein lastly, just repeating what Ed said about the pipelines, I mean, we’re going into the second quarter 2017 with what appears to be pretty exciting growth potential and what’s leading us to be still be confident in our growth targets for this year. On the deposit side, we saw $67 million of growth, which was impacted by about $70 million of run-off in year end municipal deposit, so all together really core growth about $137 million. And considering this run-off, we are pleased with the pace of deposit growth and even more so that we did it without really causing a significant move in deposit pricing. We’ve said in our Investor meetings and almost all of our internal meetings that deposit growth strategies our number one priority for 2017. Lastly, I’ll touch on -- I’ll repeat something Ed said about the capital raise, as I hit the bullet points on the investment rationale. The capital raise did increase tangible book value by $1.67 a share and if you go back a year ago some of the overhangs on the stock were -- or the two main overhangs on the stock were a really significant multiple owned tangible book value over 300% in the fourth quarter. And sort of not having the consistency in our earnings that, that we wanted. Having the efficiency ratio back in the place it is right now, we put together four, five, excuse me, four, five consistent earnings quarters and we believe that the overhangs of earnings consistency and tangible book value are growing that over time. We believe the stock is going to trend more towards our hope at least that it trends more towards a PE multiple that’s in line with our peers. With that, I will turn it back to you, Phil, for any questions that are out there.