Ladies and gentlemen thank you for standing by and welcome to the AllianceBernstein Third Quarter 2020 Earnings Review. At this time, all participants' lines are in a listen-only mode. After the remakes, there will be a question-and-answer session and I will give you instructions on how to ask questions at that time. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded and will be available for replay for one week. I would now like to turn the conference over to the host for this call Head of Investor Relations for AB, Mr. Mark Griffin. Sir please go ahead.

Thank you, Carmen. Good morning everyone and welcome to our third quarter 2020 earnings review. This conference call is being webcast and accompanied by a slide presentation that's posted in the Investor Relations section of our website, www.alliancebernstein.com. Seth Bernstein, our President and CEO; and Ali Dibadj, Head of Finance and Strategy will present our results. John Weisenseel, CFO; and Kate Burke, COO will join us for questions after our prepared remarks. Some of the information we'll present today is forward-looking and subject to certain SEC rules and regulations regarding disclosure. So, I'd like to point out the Safe Harbor language on slide two of our presentation. You can also find our Safe Harbor language in the MD&A of our third quarter 2020 10-Q which we filed earlier this morning. Under Regulation FD, management may only address questions of material nature from the investment community in a public forum. So please ask all such questions during this call. Now, I'll turn it over to Seth.

Good morning. Thank you for joining us today. We're pleased to report third quarter results that highlight consistent strength across our platform. All three channels delivered net inflows led by another robust quarter for active equities in both retail and institutional. We posted annualized active organic growth of 5% net of AXA redemptions, while expanding our margins and delivering double-digit earnings and distribution growth to unitholders. The third quarter saw a continued broad-based recovery in global financial markets across both equities and fixed income. Our retail fixed income funds outperformed peers in the third quarter as credit sectors improved, while our equities performed -- platform retained good long-term performance. Let's get into the specifics, starting with a firm-wide overview on slide four. Gross sales of $29.3 billion were up $3 billion or 11% from a year ago, moderating sequentially from second quarter's near record levels. Firm-wide net inflows were $5.3 billion excluding $2.2 billion of previously disclosed low fee AXA redemptions. Active net inflows of $7.3 billion excluding AXA redemptions represented a 5% annualized organic growth rate. Quarter end assets under management of $631 billion increased 6% year-over-year and 5% from the prior quarter. An average AUM of $624 billion increased 6% year-over-year and 8% sequentially. Slide five shows our quarterly flow trend by channel. Firm-wide net inflows reflected growth in each channel driven by strength in institutional. In retail, we generated net inflows of $700 million, led by continued strength in active equities which grew by 8% organically and munis which grew at 12% organically, more than offsetting the effect of moderating taxable fixed income sales. As shown in the bottom left chart, institutional gross sales remained strong at $8.3 billion. Excluding the AXA redemptions, we generated net inflows of $4.3 billion balanced across both active equities and active…

Thanks, Seth. So let's start with the GAAP income statement on slide 15. Third quarter GAAP net revenues of $900 million increased 3% from the prior year period. Operating income of $217 million increased 7% and the operating margin was 24.1% up 150 basis points. GAAP EPU of $0.70 compared to $0.62 in the third quarter of 2019 up 13%. As we've done in the past, we'll focus remarks from here on our adjusted results, which remove the effect of certain items that are not considered part of our core operating business. We base our distribution to unitholders upon our adjusted results, which we provide in addition to and not as a substitute for our GAAP results. Our standard GAAP reporting and reconciliation of GAAP to adjusted results are in our presentation appendix press release and 10-Q. Our adjusted financial highlights are included on slide 16. While third quarter revenues of $727 million were flat year-on-year operating income of $216 million, increased by 8%; and operating margin of 29.7% increased by 220 basis points driven by strong incremental margins. We earn and will distribute to our unitholders $0.69 per unit compared to $0.63 for last year's third quarter. Lower compensation and promotion servicing expenses, primarily drove the improved results. Compared to this year's second quarter, revenues increased by 4% due to higher base fees operating income increased 11% and our margin increased 180 basis points, reflecting operating expense growth of just 1% on lower promotion servicing and G&A expenses. We delve into these items in more detail on our adjusted income statement on slide 17. Beginning with revenues. Third quarter net revenues of $727 million were flat year-on-year. Third quarter base fees increased 1% from the same prior year period on higher average AUM partially offset by a lower portfolio…

Thank you, Ali. Turning to slide 19. You might recall last quarter, we began more directly articulating the reasons to invest in AllianceBernstein. We'll return to the slide with some frequency to test our progress on behalf of unitholders. This quarter we continue to execute along the following dimensions that we outlined. Firstly, we drove 5% active annualized organic growth ex AXA outflows based on differentiated investment performance. We continued to expand our suite of higher fee alternatives through our recently launched European Commercial Real Estate Debt business which Equitable plans to support another example of the strong mutual interest in growing our yield enhancing longer-dated alternative strategies. We drove expanded margins year-over-year and sequentially with G&A up less than 2% excluding a write-off of onetime legal fees. As a partnership, we continue to benefit from a durably low tax rate and we continue to pay 100% of our adjusted income supporting our robust distribution yield of approximately 8% in a low rate environment. We look forward to continuing to report progress along these lines in the future. With that we're pleased to take your questions.

Thank you [Operator Instructions] And your first question will come from Craig Siegenthaler. Please go ahead with your question and announce your company.

Thanks. Good morning, everyone. I wanted to start on fixed income. So just given how low rates are today and the depressed for net return prospects across fixed income, are you seeing a rise in fee pressure in either your bond business or in your private client business?

Hi, Craig. It's Seth. Thanks for the question. We've been seeing pressure for a long time in the -- particularly the investment-grade institutional business. And I think we've talked about that in the past. That continues. Haven't seen the pressure in the private client business. And in the retail business there -- I mean we have seen some pressure in the retail business that has impacted us certainly in the third quarter. But I wouldn't say that anything unexpected. I think it's just the continuation of a trend that we've been experiencing along with the industry for some time. But I think your point is right. It will continue.

And then we saw a large reset in bond yields in March and April. But despite that there's been a very strong migration into fixed income. Do you think we're at a point now where this may start to stall just given how low rates are? And I know you've seen a pickup in other areas like active equity, but most of your peers have not?

Look I think people are remain risk adverse. I think income continues to be the theme that resonates with investors both institutional and even more so at least in our experience in retail and I think that continues. There's really -- there's nowhere else they can go. But ultimately, I think the central banks are pushing people into equities. I think that is the net result of this. And so I share your concern that this could ultimately begin to reverse because the role of fixed income is harder to justify and define in a zero-bounded marketplace.

Thank you, Seth.

Your next question will come from the line of Robert Lee.

Hi. Thank you. KBW. If I could drill down a little bit into the retail flows if possible. Can you maybe break it down? How you're seeing kind of your APAC business in the quarter and what you're seeing there? I mean obviously equity flows have been good. But just trying to get a sense of what you're seeing demand-wise or expectations particularly in fixed income in Asia which has been I guess a strong point for you guys for a while.

Hi, Rob. It's Seth. Equity -- I'm sorry fixed income flows in Asia have certainly in the third quarter slowed and we see that trend continuing. I think that really is a story of two things. One, the local markets have been strong particularly the Chinese equity market. And that I think has diverted attention. I also think that as we were just talking in the prior question, Craig's question that lower rates obviously yield is important and yields have been falling as the prices have risen. So yes, I think both of those impacts are there. We certainly have not seen any wholesale run for the doors. There's continuing interest. We still see positive flows. But it's not at the level we had seen earlier this year or certainly last year.

Great. And then maybe as my follow-up you probably won't be able to get through a call with quarter without asking -- someone asking about M&A. So I guess maybe I'll ask it. I could probably guess your response, but you update us with all the recent talk chatter about consolidation and scale kind of your viewpoints on where you see AB fitting within that? And how you -- just your thoughts on that kind of trend in AB?

Sure. Hey, it's Ali. I'll take that. So, obviously, there's been a lot of activity and there's a lot of anticipated activity. I'd say three things, I guess. One is, we're very much in the flow of information on this. You can imagine, we see a lot of things come our way. We can pitch things, et cetera. And so, we're not surprised that there might be even more activity around the corner and very much had a sense of what was going on in the past. The second thing I'd say is, as we've looked at it -- as they've combined, as we look at our own history and the industry's history. We are challenged to make sense about some of the large acquisitions that went on. In other words, our philosophy is, if cost-cutting is the major vector of value creation and M&A, the probability that that M&A is going to work is actually quite low, right? And we've seen that over and over again and the market frankly has riddled with examples of that so far. So, that's our view broadly about the M&A that we've seen, much of the M&A that we've seen so far. Some of them actually makes sense. But our view, Morgan Stanley event is actually quite interesting, as an example, and most recent ones. But broadly speaking what we look at for M&A, as point number three, is areas where we can surgically bring on talent, bring on teams that we can grow. Where it's not a cost-cutting story, but it's a growth story. And that's where we find we add the most value, given our strength of distribution and finding teams that have the same investment discipline, great track record, a good cultural fit is the best way we can serve our clients. So that's our M&A philosophy.

Great. Thank you for taking my questions.

And your next question is from the line of Mike Carrier. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning. And thanks for taking the questions. First, I just wanted to clarify on performance. It sounds like 3Q was fairly strong in fixed income. But on the performance chart it seems like fixing income slipped a bit on the one year. I'm realizing that can be solid quarters rolling off, or I think you mentioned American Income. I'm a bit below, but just wanted to confirm that. And then more importantly flows have been favorable and the pipeline looks good. Just wondering if the weaker short-term investment performance is starting to have much of an impact on conversations or clients. You remain focused on the stronger three and five-year track record?

Hey, Mike, it's Seth. Let me just clarify one thing. Your question is around equity flows or fixed income flows, or both?

It's basically both, just like the 3Q performance looks a little bit weaker, but it seems like overall on the active side, not just this quarter, but you guys have still been putting up good flows. So it doesn't seem like it's having a big impact. But just more curious, if it's coming up in conversations more.

It isn't yet, but that doesn't mean it won't. And we recognize that performance is the leading indicator or one of the key leading indicators on flows. So we take it seriously. I do think that clients understand that in the case of large cap growth, which is really what triggered I think the significance in the change on the equity one year, is really a story about just how narrow the equity markets are and you guys know that story as well as we do. It's really quite remarkable. And we just weren't as concentrated as the benchmark. Now that could persist for a while. It has been out there, but we've done quite well. And in the retracement we saw a bit in September, we gained a performance as a consequence of that. So we're watching it, but we haven't seen any adverse behavior or flows as a consequence of that yet. But it's out there. With respect to fixed income, look, I think, particularly in American income the uniqueness of that strategy and the yield that it has offered clients has been compelling. Our clients in Asia in particular know the team well and are familiar and comfortable with the risk-on, risk-off nature of markets and how this portfolio performs. So it's been gaining performance since March. And we're hopeful that it will continue to gain altitude again. But, I mean, the performance is performance and so we watch it and it could foretell lower flows in the future, but it hasn't so far. But overall flows, the overall market has been slower.

Right. Okay. Makes sense. And then just given the favorable longer-term performance and some positive flow trends, just wanted to get an update on how you guys are thinking about your distribution positioning. And if you see some areas of opportunity, whether it's invest in or areas to invest in to drive additional closed event.

Well, look, first and foremost, I'm glad you asked that question, is China for us. We think that we have a lot to benefit from in building a presence and we are doing that now, as I think you know, in Shanghai and we're moving forward in our process with regulators. That will start as more of an onshore money management to onshore distribution, but our hope is that that ultimately opens up into being able to bring to Chinese investors our capabilities in global investing, both fixed income and equity. I think that hands down is the biggest opportunity we see. And that's why we're investing so aggressively there. But beyond that we continue to want to expand our private client business and are doing so and adding at base. And we are continuing to look at what we are doing here in the United States in our Retail channel. So I think, look, it's been a continuing investment focus for us since I've been here. And on the margin, China is where our emphasis is, but we continue to add resources, albeit, slowly, in the U.S. and a little bit in Europe.

Okay. Thanks a lot.

Your next question comes from the line of John Dunn. Please go ahead with your question.

Evercore ISI. Maybe just on the mechanics of the pipeline. Any changes to where the demand is coming from, or has funding times changed over the past year? And is it coming from existing customers, you're getting any new customers? Any color you could just give around the pipeline?

Sure. Thank you. Look, the pipeline had $4.9 billion of additions in the third quarter. And we -- it always changes a bit. I think what is different now is, we have, with the passage of the Secure Act we're seeing considerably more interest in customized retirement and that tends to be big DC plans. And so given the size of those, they tend to be disproportionate, they're also lower fee. We see that. We also have seen interestingly some very large fixed income investment grade, but that also tends to be lower fee. And we've seen cash. Cash has been moving back and forth. We don't have a large cash business like some other firms, but that introduces volatility both ways to the pipeline. In equities, most of that is client -- I'm sorry is consultant intermediated. And therefore, in a number of cases our new clients to the firm and so it's continued to be a door opener for us both here and in Europe, and to some degree in Australia. And so that has been positive for us. And in the alternative space that really is institutional as well. And when it's fund raising for the commercial real estate debt or middle market lending, they tend to go back to their original investors or their existing investor base. But we continue to add periodically, mostly from insurers and others, who are looking for higher yielding assets.

Thank you. And then, maybe a little more on the European, commercial real estate business, maybe what order kind of the objective? Maybe what this might potentially look like, over the next few years? And then, how does that region differ from the U.S.?

Well, we -- we want to take advantage -- well Ali why don't you answer the question?

Okay. No, no problem. I think we're probably going to say, roughly the same thing. Thanks for the question there. Look, we're really pleased to have launched this commercial real estate debt business in Europe. It's important for us for a couple of main reasons. One is it's a classic example of us being able to lift and shift our knowledge base and our capabilities. And frankly a little bit of our brand from one region to the other. Obviously we have a very strong U.S. commercial real estate debt business. And so launching this in Europe is something that's very important to us and shows the ability for us to expand on those. The second thing that it showed and Seth mentioned this in his prepared remarks is importantly it ties in to planned commitment from Equitable, it ties very much to their strategy, publicly stated of improving their yield, improving their returns, and this is a great way to do that. We think to your questions this scales quite well. And we do believe that there's more opportunities like this, in alts to expand geographically from what we have as a good core base in the U.S.

Got it. Thanks very much.

Your next question is from the line of Robert Lee. Please go ahead with your question.

Great. Thanks for taking my follow-ups. So I'm just curious, I mean in the Private Wealth business you called it out that your SMA Tax-Loss Harvesting business and arguably, something similarly maybe one of these things that tracking Morgan Stanley and the AB brand. So could you talk a little bit about, are there plans to kind of roll out that capability more broadly than retail? That was my question.

Hi it's Kate Burke here. Look, in our Private Wealth business, I think that, what you've seen from a tax perspective much of what we do is really in that SMA form. And that is a very attractive area for us that we continue to look to leverage and building out overall the Private Wealth business. We certainly are looking from a product strategy standpoint, across channels and how we can leverage success in one channel to another that has been a focus of our product strategy work here. And so we're going to continue to look for opportunities to see if there's a way to leverage that also in the Retail channel.

Great. If I could -- maybe just one more follow-up, just Seth generally, I mean you guys I think have always been more sensitive to capacity constraints and your strategies maybe relative to some peers, which long-term is a good thing. I'm just curious, I know if you have any -- I mean key strategies where you feel like you may be approaching capacity limitations over the coming quarters, just given good demand?

It's Seth. Let me answer that. Well we obviously always are monitoring capacity in small and mid-cap space. And some of that is closer and so that would be the most likely stuff. In the larger cap areas, we do have capacity limits. We think we have sufficient room that it shouldn't be impacting us any time in the near future, given the level of flows we're having.

Great. Thank you for taking my follow-ups.

Thank you. And your next question is from the line of Bill Katz.

Okay. Thank you very much for taking my questions. Just some technical difficulties on my end, just in terms of the five consultant upgrades, are you went through that rather quickly. I was just wondering if you could maybe step back and just talk about maybe the cumulative opportunity across the product lines there?

Hi Bill its Seth. Yeah, I think over it quickly and maybe I should have been slower. We got two upgrades for our select long short strategy. We had an upgrade for global core, And an upgrade for our Eurozone equity, and an upgrade for our sustainable growth service. Look, I think there's significant opportunity, as we get broader support from the consultant community. The lead time on that is very hard to -- yes. It's when they have demand and start refocusing on those spaces. And so it tends to be episodic. So for example, we've seen a lot of interest for our global core strategy and now lot of that was a consultant sponsored. And it's -- they utilize a sustainable lens and to evaluate the companies they invest in. And they had a lot of appeal to institutions particularly outside the United States, where ESG is a more important focus. We think that's adaptable in the United States well. So we do see it as an important door opener for us. But I think we would be foolish to try and handicap it. And estimate what the impacts are not that you were asking so specifically for it. Because it's very much on their timeframe and their priorities, that we -- and we benefit from it.

Great. Okay. And just maybe a follow-up for Ali and thanks for taking my questions this morning, you gave some fourth quarter guidance for the comp. Just sort of quick recollection, that ratio seems to be a little bit higher than what maybe was in the past couple of years of this -- for the fourth quarter. What would be some of the sort of the variables for your thinking in terms of what might be a range within that, no more than 48%? How to think about what some of the key drivers might be?

So, thanks for the question. I guess, in an absolute term 48% isn't higher than what we delivered in the past, in the fourth quarter at least from where we started the year. Remember, when we started this year we took down the comp ratio by a full point. So we started at a much lower level than we have done in the past. And we as you've seen have done our best to ratchet that down over time by being just more efficient across the board, so that's just a little bit more context to that question. For the fourth quarter specifically, but the big variable is going to view the markets. If the market is where we are today we don't think will go above 48%. But frankly your magic eight ball is probably as good as my magic eight ball about what could happen over the next couple of quarters. And so we just want to be very prudent in that to make sure that we are appropriately careful about the comp ratio and making sure we provide for our talent at the firm in the context of what's probably going to be a volatile market.

Okay. Thank you.

Your next question is from the line of Alex Blostein. Go ahead with your question.

Great, good morning. Thanks. Hey guys I was hoping you could expand a little bit on some of the recent commentary you made with respect to your relationship with Equitable. They obviously have a stated policy with trying to improve their yield on the assets just like many other insurance companies I guess. But can you talk a little bit about what strategies that you provide fit well within that? What are sort of the fee rates and opportunity set you see that for yourself? And I guess lastly, is there a bigger almost kind of like investment management agreement dynamic that you guys could work out with Equitable at some point of time like we've seen with other sort of like insurance and asset management partnerships? Thanks.

Alex, thanks for the question. Look we've been building our private alternatives business hand-in-hand with AXA initially and now Equitable. And we focus with our middle market lending business with our commercial real estate debt business. We will do the same with our European commercial real estate business. And we're continuing to look for other interesting areas within private credit to build with the sponsorship of Equitable although they have to separately evaluate it and review its appropriateness for their general account. But we work very closely strategically with them in planning out that agenda and we have an understanding with them about our process and timing and the ultimate amount of money that we may need for them to deploy and support helping us build out those additional capabilities. We think actually the partnership as it's currently configured with Equitable is the way it should work because of the lines the interest of the policyholders and Equitable and AB's shareholders and unitholders respectively. In that ultimately Equitable benefits from the improvement in earnings we get from what are clearly higher feed products and growth of those new businesses through their 60-plus -- 65% holding of AB units -- AB's ownership. So we think that alignment is pretty natural. And I think the coordination between the firms is quite strong and quite interactive. So we think it's an important plank in our growth strategy.

Your next question is from the line of Dan Fannon. Please go ahead with your question.

Thanks, good morning. Just wanted to follow-up on the fee rate and kind of the outlook there, retail seems to be the soft point in the quarter. Can you talk about the mix and kind of what are some of the factors are behind that? And how we should think about the fee rate I guess in the overall context going forward?

Sure. Thanks Dan. So let's talk about the fee rate and just aggregate it a little bit to give you some extra color. So look on a year-on-year basis it was down 190 so 1.9 basis points. Lots of moving parts obviously. But essentially that change is the same change as we saw last quarter on a year-on-year basis. The idea some of the issues and some of what's moving around is effectively the same. Broadly speaking just to remind you the value equities portion of our AUM was lower last quarter year-on-year this quarter year-on-year. And that is a very high fee product right? So that's a mix effect. That actually happened pretty meaningfully in the private wealth channel that shift around and value equities happen there as well. But you're right I mean more broadly we are seeing some pressure as Seth mentioned in his prepared remarks and answered to earlier question on fixed income and some of that is in the Retail channel as well. But net-net on a year-on-year basis broadly the same themes that we saw last quarter we talked about last quarter. And that leads to I guess the second point which is on a quarter-on-quarter basis we're essentially flat right? So essentially flat. We're seeing some fee pressure across the board Institutional Retail, but nothing remarkable I'd say relative to some of the stuff that we talked about last quarter. The one thing though from a going forward perspective that it's worth emphasizing to your question about what we'd anticipate. And Seth mentioned just a little bit, but it's just worth underlining is if you look at the pipeline, the pipeline specially on the Institutional side has a very broad dispersion right now of fee rates in it, right? So yes alternatives, yes active equity is the majority of it the largest piece of it. But you'll see this and you saw this in some of our monthly AUM announcements that we're getting lifetime income strategy and CRS mandates. We're getting some of these mandates that are really chunky so really big mandates. We disclosed the $2.6 billion one that we talked about before. And those just by nature of what they are much lower fee rates. So the dispersion within the pipeline is quite big. What that means is although the fee rate will be grinding higher, right? It may not be linearly grinding higher, right? As something fun that's a lower fee rate and it happens to be an x billion dollar mandate you might have quarter-to-quarter volatility in that fee rate. But the thesis is exactly the same as it's been. And we're fortunate to have some of these larger mandates come in. They happen to be lower fee rate. But again, it's the same thesis as before grinding slightly higher over time, but could be a little bit more volatile quarter-to-quarter.

Thank you. That's helpful. And, I guess, just thinking about spending for next year it's early. I'm sure you're still in the budgeting process, but just trying to get a sense of kind of what you're thinking about kind of return to normalization for certain discretionary items and how we should be thinking about kind of 2021 expense trajectories for some of those line items?

So you're right, we're going through that process right now. If you look for example, at some of our expenses and disaggregate them, right? Comp and Ben as you know we're pretty focused on that and some of the help that Nashville is going to give us -- will certainly flow into that we hope going forward. But if you look at for example promotion and servicing and G&A, right? So promo and servicing, obviously, was the big in this quarter and you've seen so far as the past couple of quarters a drop for the year. The big driver of that is certainly T&E, which is down a lot right? So you can imagine -- think about your own travel schedule, think about our own travel schedule and a lot of travel going on, right? So our hope for everybody's sake broadly for the world that that gets back to a little bit more of a normalized level. We are, however, looking for opportunities to not go back necessarily to the same level as we were say in 2019 as a whole. We're trying to really think through what the opportunities are. For instance, we have conferences that are much more virtual now. I'm sure you all do as well. And is that something that we can do with more permanency. To be clear, we don't expect things in T&E to be down as much as they were this year, next year, but we're being very, very careful in not trying to go back to like the past normal because it might not be the past normal going forward. All that to say, we'll wait and see and we'll see what the clients want and adjust accordingly, but our hope is there'll be some savings right and learnings from what's happened this year on the promo and servicing area. On G&A the guidance is the same, right? We always try to keep that in line with inflation hopefully a little bit slightly below. And again, you've seen it go up 4% quarter-on-quarter for this quarter. Remember that if you exclude some of these onetime charge-offs it's less than 2% of growth, which is very much within the bound that we want G&A to go at. So hopefully it gives you a little bit more color as we think about it going forward.

Sure. Thank you.

And there are no further questions at this time. I'll now hand the call back to Mr. Griffin for any closing remarks.

Thank you, everyone for participating in our conference call today. Feel free to contact Investor Relations with any further questions and have a great day.

Thank you for joining today's webcast and conference call. You may now disconnect. Feel free to contact Investor Relations with any further questions. Please have a great day.