Yes, thanks, Michael. As we've touched on, ours is an institutional business, and so some of the numbers can be large, and they are episodic. So, if there weren't necessarily any pattern to unpack; it was just sort of coincidence, if you will, that we had these large numbers on both sides. On the inflows, there's really almost just really just three large clients that came in. There was a client that was more than a couple of billion, another one for a $1 billion, and another close to $1 billion, so these are really large numbers. And they were in assorted strategies, and not -- I wouldn't say there were any patterns to unpack in terms of any particular strategy, it was just that the strategies that these clients came in, and they came in large numbers. And it happened to be that these three large inflows happened to be in the same quarter. On the outflow side, similar story; that we had really a large client close to a couple billion, another client more than $1 billion, another client sort of similar number, different strategies that just happened to be in the same quarter. So, it was quite sort of a -- quite a bit of a coincidence that it just all happened in one quarter. But, yes, it all sort of cancelled each other out, so that's interesting. And we don't -- going forward, if you guess, the best sort of -- another part of your question. As we've guided in the past few quarters, we see more of a breakeven-to-flat cadence that we do have. And the pipeline remains healthy across stages. We have a good pipeline across different strategies, and across different stages. And we still see some pressures from managed volatility strategies, among other. We see rebalancing going on by clients in these rising equity markets when they take some chips off the table. There are some clients that are moving to a fixed income as a way to manage their -- [technical difficulty] profiling the liability-driven investing. So, all of those puts and takes, we think about a breakeven kind of cadence for a few quarters here.